Literature DB >> 10495601

Who gets second opinions?

T H Wagner1, L S Wagner.   

Abstract

Six states require health plans to provide or authorize second medical opinions (SMOs). The intent of such legislation is to preserve consumer choice, to improve the flow of information, and to improve health outcomes in this era of managed care. However, it is unclear who benefits from these laws. This paper reviews the changing role of second opinions and, using a nationally representative data set from the Commonwealth Fund, examines who gets them. Of persons who had visited a doctor in the previous year, 19 percent received a second opinion, for an estimated cost of $3.2 billion in 1994. Findings suggest that cultural norms and sociocultural factors may partially determine who may benefit from SMO legislation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10495601     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.5.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  12 in total

1.  Second opinions from urologists for prostate cancer: Who gets them, why, and their link to treatment.

Authors:  Archana Radhakrishnan; David Grande; Nandita Mitra; Justin Bekelman; Christian Stillson; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Do first opinions affect second opinions?

Authors:  Geva Vashitz; Joseph S Pliskin; Yisrael Parmet; Yona Kosashvili; Gal Ifergane; Shlomo Wientroub; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Seeking a second medical opinion: composition, reasons and perceived outcomes in Israel.

Authors:  Liora Shmueli; Nadav Davidovitch; Joseph S Pliskin; Ran D Balicer; Igal Hekselman; Geva Greenfield
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 4.  Patient-Driven Second Opinions in Oncology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marij A Hillen; Niki M Medendorp; Joost G Daams; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-06-12

5.  Values and risks of second opinion in Japan's universal health-care system.

Authors:  Sawako Okamoto; Kazuo Kawahara; Atsushi Okawa; Yujiro Tanaka
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  From physician to consumer: the effectiveness of strategies to manage health care utilization.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Maureen A Smith; Margaret K Davis
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 7.  When Should You Trust Your Doctor? Establishing a Theoretical Model to Evaluate the Value of Second Opinion Visits.

Authors:  Michael Halasy; Jason Shafrin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  Retrospective analysis of patients self-referred to comprehensive ophthalmology seeking second opinions.

Authors:  Daniel Gologorsky; Scott H Greenstein
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-11

9.  Orthopedic surgeons' and neurologists' attitudes towards second opinions in the Israeli healthcare system: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Geva Greenfield; Joseph S Pliskin; Shlomo Wientroub; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2012-07-24

10.  Association of treatment and outcomes of doctor-shopping behavior in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Cheng-I Hsieh; Kuo-Piao Chung; Ming-Chin Yang; Tsai-Chung Li
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.