Literature DB >> 10495174

Magnetic resonance imaging of the patellar tendon after harvesting its central third: a comparison between traditional and subcutaneous harvesting techniques.

J Kartus1, S Lindahl, S Stener, B I Eriksson, J Karlsson.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the 2-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autografts harvested through a paratenon-splitting, traditional technique (group A) with the results of a subcutaneous technique aiming at protecting the infrapatellar nerves and the paratenon (group B). Special emphasis was placed on evaluating the donor site. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the patellar tendon was performed to evaluate the reconstitution after harvesting its central third. Examinations of knee-walking ability and assessments of anterior knee sensitivity were made in order to evaluate donor-site discomfort and the function of infrapatellar nerves. Seventy-two consecutive patients were included in the study; group A comprised 35 patients and group B, 37 patients. At the 2-year follow-up, the Tegner activity level, the Lysholm score, and the IKDC evaluation system showed no significant differences between groups A and B. The median loss of normal anterior knee sensitivity was 16 cm2 (range, 0 to 200 cm2) in group A and 0 cm2 (range, 0 to 285 cm2) in group B (P = .20). In group A 20% of the patients and in group B 58% had normal sensitivity (P < .01). MRI showed that the donor-site gap (area corresponding to non-tendinous-like tissue signal) was 5 mm (range, 0 to 9 mm) in group A and 2 mm (range, 0 to 5 mm) in group B (P < .0001). At 2-year follow-up, the subcutaneous graft-harvesting technique resulted in less disturbance of anterior knee sensitivity and a smaller donor-site gap than the traditional technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10495174     DOI: 10.1053/ar.1999.v15.015058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  8 in total

1.  Entrapment of the saphenous nerve at the adductor canal affecting the infrapatellar branch - a report on two cases.

Authors:  Jason Porr; Karen Chrobak; Brad Muir
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2013-12

2.  Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Jüri Kartus; Lars Ejerhed; Jón Karlsson; Ninni Sernert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft to Avoid Harvest-Site Morbidity in Knee Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Eitaku Koh; Kenichi Oe; Seisuke Takemura; Hirokazu Iida
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-04-27

4.  The course of the patellar tendon after reharvesting its central third for ACL revision surgery: a long-term clinical and radiographic study.

Authors:  Mattias Lidén; Lars Ejerhed; Ninni Sernert; Ake Bovaller; Jon Karlsson; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Healing of donor site in bone-tendon-bone ACL reconstruction accelerated with plasma rich in growth factors: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Roberto Seijas; Marta Rius; Oscar Ares; Montserrat García-Balletbó; Iván Serra; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for asian patient using a bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon composite autograft: a technical note.

Authors:  Takuya Tajima; Etsuo Chosa; Keitaro Yamamoto; Nami Yamaguchi
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2012-03-14

7.  ACL ideal graft: MRI correlation between ACL and humstrings, PT and QT.

Authors:  Fabiano Kupczik; Marlus Eduardo Gunia Schiavon; Bruno Sbrissia; Rodrigo Caldonazzo Fávaro; Rafael Valério
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2013-10-18

8.  Outside-in technique versus inside-out semitendinosus graft harvest technique in ACLR: a randomised control trial.

Authors:  Silvampatti Ramasamy Sundararajan; Rajagopalakrishnan Ramakanth; Amit Kumar Jha; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.