Literature DB >> 10492544

Assessing the clinical effectiveness of an aerosol reduction device for the air polisher.

K B Muzzin1, T B King, C W Berry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the growing concern of the infectious nature of aerosols produced by air polishers, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Dental Association have made recommendations to minimize dental aerosols. In addition, a device was developed in 1997 to reduce the aerosol generated during air polishing.
METHODS: The authors conducted a blinded clinical study to determine the effectiveness of an aerosol reduction device during air polishing. All 30 subjects underwent two minutes of air polishing, one with the aerosol reduction device on one side of the mouth and one without the device on the opposite side. Microbial samples were collected on blood agar plates positioned 12 inches from the subject's mouth and from one plate attached to the dental hygienist's face mask. The sample plates were then inverted and incubated for three days at 37 C.
RESULTS: Using the paired t-test, the authors found that the air polisher without the aerosol reduction device generated a significantly greater mean quantity of colony-forming units, or CFUs, 12 inches from the subject's mouth (mean +/- standard deviation, 148.00 +/- 145.00 CFUs) than the air polisher with the aerosol reduction device (20.10 +/- 53.90 CFUs) (P < .0001). In addition, the air polisher without the aerosol reduction device generated a significantly greater number of CFUs on the face mask plate (40.90 +/- 33.80 CFUs) than the air polisher with the aerosol reduction device (8.80 +/- 15.10 CFUs) (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the aerosol reduction device is effective in reducing the number of microorganisms generated during air polishing. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Air polishing with the aerosol reduction device may decrease the potential for disease transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10492544     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  9 in total

1.  Effects of preoperative air-powder polishing and rubber-cup prophylaxis on tooth bleaching: randomized controlled split-mouth clinical study.

Authors:  Zeliha Gonca Bek Kurklu; Mustafa Ozcan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Reopening of dental clinics during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an evidence-based review of literature for clinical interventions.

Authors:  Seied Omid Keyhan; Hamid Reza Fallahi; Amin Motamedi; Vahid Khoshkam; Paymon Mehryar; Omid Moghaddas; Behzad Cheshmi; Parsa Firoozi; Parisa Yousefi; Behzad Houshmand
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-08-03

3.  Sources of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Microorganisms in Dental Aerosols.

Authors:  A P Meethil; S Saraswat; P P Chaudhary; S M Dabdoub; P S Kumar
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.924

4.  Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious diseases.

Authors:  Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati; Martha Paisi; Mona Nasser; Gowri Sivaramakrishnan; Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-12

5.  Efficacy of High-volume Evacuator in Aerosol Reduction: Truth or Myth? A Clinical and Microbiological Study.

Authors:  Hitesh Desarda; Abhijit Gurav; Chandrakant Dharmadhikari; Abhijeet Shete; Subodh Gaikwad
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2014-09-17

6.  Mitigating saliva aerosol contamination in a dental school clinic.

Authors:  Maobin Yang; Asad Chaghtai; Marc Melendez; Hana Hasson; Eugene Whitaker; Mustafa Badi; Leona Sperrazza; Jeffrey Godel; Cemil Yesilsoy; Marisol Tellez; Santiago Orrego; Carolina Montoya; Amid Ismail
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Dental periodontal procedures: a systematic review of contamination (splatter, droplets and aerosol) in relation to COVID-19.

Authors:  Ilona G Johnson; Rhiannon J Jones; Jennifer E Gallagher; William G Wade; Waraf Al-Yaseen; Mark Robertson; Scott McGregor; Sukriti K C; Nicola Innes; Rebecca Harris
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2021-03-24

8.  Role of preprocedural rinse and high volume evacuator in reducing bacterial contamination in bioaerosols.

Authors:  T V Narayana; Leeky Mohanty; G Sreenath; Pavani Vidhyadhari
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

Review 9.  Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications.

Authors:  Stephen K Harrel; John Molinari
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.634

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.