Literature DB >> 10490556

Trends in the provision of thrombolytic treatment between 1993 and 1997. Myocardial Infarction Audit Group.

J S Birkhead1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in provision of thrombolytic treatment between 1993 and 1997.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SUBJECTS: 3714 patients in 15 UK hospitals who had an admission diagnosis of myocardial infarction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in prehospital and hospital delay before thrombolytic treatment; use of emergency services.
RESULTS: Between 1993 and 1997 the proportion of patients who called for help within 30 minutes of the onset of symptoms fell from 42.6% to 36.0%; difference 6.6% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.3% to 10%). The direct use of the emergency service by patients and by doctors sending an ambulance without seeing the patient increased by 18.9%. Patients given thrombolytic treatment within 90 minutes of calling for help increased from 28.2% to 39.1%; difference 10.9% (95% CI 7.2% to 14.7%). Over the same period the proportion of patients treated in emergency departments increased from 4.4% to 17.3%, and the median delay from arrival to treatment in emergency departments fell from 53 to 36 minutes. Median delays for patients treated in cardiac care units after assessment in the emergency department fell from 63 to 54 minutes.
CONCLUSION: Between 1993 and 1997 there was an increase in the proportion of patients with definite infarction having thrombolytic treatment within 90 minutes of a call for help. This was mainly the result of greater use of the emergency service and more rapid treatment of a larger proportion of eligible patients in emergency departments. Longer delays by patients have cancelled out some of this improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10490556      PMCID: PMC1760299          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.82.4.438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  9 in total

1.  Delayed hospital presentation in patients who have had acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J H Gurwitz; T J McLaughlin; D J Willison; E Guadagnoli; P J Hauptman; X Gao; S B Soumerai
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Effectiveness of a 'thrombolysis nurse' in shortening delay to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J D Somauroo; P McCarten; B Appleton; A Amadi; E Rodrigues
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb

3.  Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review.

Authors:  W D Weaver; R J Simes; A Betriu; C L Grines; F Zijlstra; E Garcia; L Grinfeld; R J Gibbons; E E Ribeiro; M A DeWood; F Ribichini
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  An evaluation of the results of media and educational campaigns designed to shorten the time taken by patients with acute myocardial infarction to decide to go to hospital.

Authors:  M B Blohm; M Hartford; B W Karlson; R V Luepker; J Herlitz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour.

Authors:  E Boersma; A C Maas; J W Deckers; M L Simoons
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-09-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Time delays in provision of thrombolytic treatment in six district hospitals. Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and a Cardiology Committee of Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  J S Birkhead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22

7.  Guidelines for the early management of patients with myocardial infarction. British Heart Foundation Working Group.

Authors:  C F Weston; W J Penny; D G Julian
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-03-19

8.  Comparison of clinical presentation of acute myocardial infarction in patients older than 65 years of age to younger patients: the Multicenter Chest Pain Study experience.

Authors:  C G Solomon; T H Lee; E F Cook; M C Weisberg; D A Brand; G W Rouan; L Goldman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Distinguishing between early and late responders to symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R E Burnett; J A Blumenthal; D B Mark; J D Leimberger; R M Califf
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Improving care for patients with acute coronary syndromes: initial results from the National Audit of Myocardial Infarction Project (MINAP).

Authors:  J S Birkhead; L Walker; M Pearson; C Weston; A D Cunningham; A F Rickards
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Potential impact of interventions to reduce times to thrombolysis.

Authors:  S Goodacre; A-M Kelly; D Kerr
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Urban-rural inequalities in ischemic heart disease in Scotland, 1981-1999.

Authors:  Kate A Levin; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  A new performance indicator for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R M Norris
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Where are we today? Early results from MINAP, the National Audit of Myocardial Infarction Project.

Authors:  J Birkhead
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Missing, mediocre, or merely obsolete? An evaluation of UK data sources for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  B Unal; J A Critchley; S Capewell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.710

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.