Literature DB >> 10488984

The bridging lateral mandibular reconstruction plate revisited.

K E Blackwell1, V Lacombe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lateral oromandibular reconstruction using a soft tissue free flap with a first-generation locking mandibular reconstruction plate (MRP) was rejected in a previous series by the senior author (K.E.B.) owing to a high incidence of delayed plate extrusion through the cheek skin.
OBJECTIVE: To reexamine this method of reconstruction using a second-generation, low-profile MRP. PATIENTS AND
DESIGN: A prospective case series of 27 patients with segmental defects of the lateral mandible after treatment of head and neck cancer.
SETTING: An academic tertiary care referral center. INTERVENTION: All patients had mandibular continuity restored using the Leibinger Locking System (Stryker Leibinger Inc, Kalamazoo, Mich) MRP. Associated soft tissue defects were repaired using radial forearm (n = 22) or rectus abdominis (n= 5) free flaps. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of hardware-related complications.
RESULTS: All microvascular flap transfers were successful. One patient experienced a plate fracture 9 months after reconstruction. Only 1 patient experienced external plate exposure, 6 months after undergoing reconstruction of a through-and-through defect. Reconstruction was successful in 25 (93%) of the cases after a median follow-up period of 19.5 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of external plate exposure in patients undergoing lateral oromandibular reconstruction using soft tissue free flaps and first-generation locking MRPs may have resulted from a plate geometry that was prone to result in extrusion. After a similar length of follow-up, the incidence of reconstructive failure was reduced by using a low-profile, rounded-contour MRP. Final assessment of the durability of this technique will require long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10488984     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.125.9.988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  6 in total

1.  Free flap reconstruction of lateral mandibular defects: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Nichole R Dean; Mark K Wax; Frank W Virgin; J Scott Magnuson; William R Carroll; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Dentate transport discs can be used to reconstruct large segmental mandibular defects.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; Veera Malavia; Ibrahim Zakhary; Timothy Mulone; Elias D Kontogiorgos; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Comparison of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and osteoactivin for mesenchymal cell differentiation: effects of bolus and continuous administration.

Authors:  Oneida A Arosarena; Fabiola E Del Carpio-Cano; Raul A Dela Cadena; Mario C Rico; Emeka Nwodim; Fayez F Safadi
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Oromandibular reconstruction using titanium plate and pectoralis major myocutaneous flap.

Authors:  P Salvatori; E Motto; S Paradisi; A Zani; S Podrecca; R Molinari
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Complications of Free Flaps for Oromandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Amit Walia; Joshua Mendoza; Craig A Bollig; Ethan J Craig; Ryan S Jackson; Jason T Rich; Sidharth V Puram; Sean T Massa; Patrik Pipkorn
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.970

6.  Surgical site infections following oral cavity cancer resection and reconstruction is a risk factor for plate exposure.

Authors:  Christopher M Yao; Hedyeh Ziai; Gordon Tsang; Andrea Copeland; Dale Brown; Jonathan C Irish; Ralph W Gilbert; David P Goldstein; Patrick J Gullane; John R de Almeida
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-04-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.