Literature DB >> 10488159

Determination of Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in an asymptomatic screening population: performances of the LCx and COBAS Amplicor tests with urine specimens.

S A Morré1, I G Van Valkengoed, R M Moes, A J Boeke, C J Meijer, A J Van den Brule.   

Abstract

This study determined the performances of the LCx (Abbott) and COBAS Amplicor (Roche) tests with urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an asymptomatic screening population. Randomly selected women and men (age range, 15 to 40 years) registered in 20 general practices in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, were invited to participate in this study. Urine specimens (n = 2, 906; 1,138 specimens from men and 1,717 specimens from women) were tested for C. trachomatis by the COBAS Amplicor (Roche) and LCx (Abbott) tests. Samples which were positive by only one assay were subjected to discrepant analyses by a third assay (in-house plasmid PCR). By the LCx assay C. trachomatis DNA was detected in urine specimens from 46 of 1,717 women and 29 of 1,138 men, while the COBAS Amplicor detected C. trachomatis DNA in 52 and 35 specimens, respectively. When comparing the LCx and COBAS Amplicor tests, 32 test results (20 for women and 12 for men) were discrepant. After discrepant analyses the following sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values were found for the LCx and COBAS Amplicor tests: 78.6 versus 98.8%, 99.7 versus 99.9%, and 88.0 versus 95.4%, respectively. No prominent differences were found between men and women with regard to the test performances. After discrepant analyses the overall prevalences of C. trachomatis in women and men were 3.0 and 2.8%, respectively. For both women and men the prevalence in the younger age groups was higher than that in the older age groups. In conclusion, the COBAS Amplicor tests shows better diagnostic characteristics than the LCx assay for the detection of C. trachomatis in urine specimens from an asymptomatic screening population. In this asymptomatic population the overall prevalence of C. trachomatis was 2.9%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10488159      PMCID: PMC85500          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.10.3092-3096.1999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  34 in total

Review 1.  DFA, EIA, PCR, LCR and other technologies: what tests should be used for diagnosis of chlamydia infections?

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  Immunol Invest       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Genital Chlamydia infections in sexually active female adolescents: do we really need to screen everyone?

Authors:  D J Mosure; S Berman; D Fine; S DeLisle; W Cates; J R Boring
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.

Authors:  R Pasternack; P Vuorinen; T Pitkäjärvi; M Koskela; A Miettinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits.

Authors:  A Stary; S Tomazic-Allen; B Choueiri; J Burczak; K Steyrer; H Lee
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  RNA amplification by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification with an internal standard enables reliable detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical scrapings and urine samples.

Authors:  S A Morré; P Sillekens; M V Jacobs; P van Aarle; S de Blok; B van Gemen; J M Walboomers; C J Meijer; A J van den Brule
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  G J van Doornum; M Buimer; M Prins; C J Henquet; R A Coutinho; P K Plier; S Tomazic-Allen; H Hu; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine.

Authors:  H H Lee; M A Chernesky; J Schachter; J D Burczak; W W Andrews; S Muldoon; G Leckie; W E Stamm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection.

Authors:  D Scholes; A Stergachis; F E Heidrich; H Andrilla; K K Holmes; W E Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Chlamydia trachomatis and ectopic pregnancy: retrospective analysis of salpingectomy specimens, endometrial biopsies, and cervical smears.

Authors:  J Lan; A J van den Brule; D J Hemrika; E K Risse; J M Walboomers; M E Schipper; C J Meijer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Uppsala County, Sweden, 1985-1993: declining rates for how much longer?

Authors:  B Herrmann; M Egger
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  17 in total

1.  Pooling of urine specimens for detection of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections by PCR in a low-prevalence population: cost-saving strategy for epidemiological studies and screening programs.

Authors:  S A Morré; C J Meijer; C Munk; S Krüger-Kjaer; J F Winther; H O Jørgensens; A J van Den Brule
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Pooling cervical swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR: sensitivity, dilution, inhibition, and cost-saving aspects.

Authors:  S A Morré; R van Dijk; C J Meijer; A J van den Brule; S K Kjaer; C Munk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis serovars in men and women with a symptomatic or asymptomatic infection: an association with clinical manifestations?

Authors:  S A Morré; L Rozendaal; I G van Valkengoed; A J Boeke; P C van Voorst Vader; J Schirm; S de Blok; J A van Den Hoek; G J van Doornum; C J Meijer; A J van Den Brule
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Multicenter evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens, female endocervical swabs, and male urethral swabs.

Authors:  B Van Der Pol; D V Ferrero; L Buck-Barrington; E Hook; C Lenderman; T Quinn; C A Gaydos; J Lovchik; J Schachter; J Moncada; G Hall; M J Tuohy; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Vulvovaginal-swab or first-catch urine specimen to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women in a community setting?

Authors:  Sue Skidmore; Paddy Horner; Alan Herring; Joanne Sell; Ian Paul; Jane Thomas; E Owen Caul; Matthias Egger; Anne McCarthy; Emma Sanford; Chris Salisbury; John Macleod; Jonathan A C Sterne; Nicola Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Greece: first prevalence study using nucleic acid amplification tests.

Authors:  S Levidiotou; G Vrioni; H Papadogeorgaki; K Avdeliodi; H Kada; G Kaparos; E Kouskouni; E Fragouli; N J Legakis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  PreservCyt transport medium used for the ThinPrep Pap test is a suitable medium for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the COBAS Amplicor CT/NG test: results of a preliminary study and future implications.

Authors:  Anne Bianchi; François Moret; Jean-Marc Desrues; Thierry Champenois; Yves Dervaux; Orlane Desvouas; André Oursin; Dominique Quinzat; Roger Dachez; Christian Bathelier; Christophe Ronsin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  H M Götz; J E A M van Bergen; I K Veldhuijzen; J Broer; C J P A Hoebe; E W Steyerberg; A J J Coenen; F de Groot; M J C Verhooren; D T van Schaik; J H Richardus
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Low diagnostic accuracy of selective screening criteria for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the general population.

Authors:  I G van Valkengoed; S A Morré; A J van den Brule; C J Meijer; W Devillé; L M Bouter; A J Boeke
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Evaluation of a modified sanitary napkin as a sample self-collection device for the detection of genital chlamydial infection in women.

Authors:  M Alary; C Poulin; C Bouchard; M Fortier; G Murray; S Gingras; M Aubé; C Morin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.