Literature DB >> 10484210

Temporal sensitivity deficits in patients with high-risk drusen.

J A Phipps1, R H Guymer, A J Vingrys.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Data is reported from an ongoing trial considering functional losses in patients with high-risk drusen. We evaluate the temporal processing in 12 subjects: four patients with high-risk drusen, four age-matched controls and four young observers aged 22-30.
METHODS: Subjects were tested using frequency-doubling technology, macula static and flicker fields on a Medmont perimeter and foveal temporal contrast sensitivity at 2, 5, 10 and 24 Hz.
RESULTS: Eyes with high-risk drusen had good visual acuity (6/9.5(-2) or better). All control eyes had normal fields for static, flicker and frequency-doubling perimetry. All high-risk drusen eyes had normal static perimetry in the presence of abnormal flicker and frequency-doubling perimetry. High-risk drusen eyes showed a generalized loss of temporal sensitivity across all frequencies.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that eyes with high-risk drusen show losses to temporal stimuli in the presence of near-normal acuity and static thresholds. We suggest that flickering stimuli might be useful for detecting and monitoring such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10484210     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1606.1999.00193.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0814-9763


  3 in total

1.  Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter.

Authors:  Andrew John Anderson; Chris A Johnson; Murray Fingeret; John L Keltner; Paul G D Spry; Michael Wall; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Measuring visual function in age-related macular degeneration with frequency-doubling (matrix) perimetry.

Authors:  Andrew John Anderson; Chris A Johnson; John S Werner
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  Should clinical automated perimetry be considered for routine functional assessment of early/intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD)? A systematic review of current literature.

Authors:  Matt Trinh; Michael Kalloniatis; Lisa Nivison-Smith
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.992

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.