OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to evaluate the QT interval and heart rate responses to exercise and recovery in gene and mutation type-specific subgroups of long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients. BACKGROUND: Reduced heart rate and repolarization abnormalities are encountered among long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients. The most common types of LQTS are LQT1 and LQT2. METHODS: An exercise stress test was performed in 23 patients with a pore region mutation and in 22 patients with a C-terminal end mutation of the cardiac potassium channel gene causing LQT1 type of long QT syndrome (KVLQT1 gene), as well as in 20 patients with mutations of the cardiac potassium channel gene causing LQT2 type of long QT syndrome (HERG gene) and in 33 healthy relatives. The QT intervals were measured on electrocardiograms at rest and during and after exercise. QT intervals were compared at similar heart rates, and rate adaptation of QT was studied as QT/heart rate slopes. RESULTS: In contrast to the LQT2 patients, achieved maximum heart rate was decreased in both LQT1 patient groups, being only 76 +/- 5% of predicted in patients with pore region mutation of KvLQT1. The QT/heart rate slopes were significantly steeper in LQT2 patients than in controls during exercise. During recovery, the QT/heart rate slopes were steeper in all LQTS groups than in controls, signifying that QT intervals lengthened excessively when heart rate decreased. At heart rates of 110 or 100 beats/min during recovery, all LQT1 patients and 89% of LQT2 patients had QT intervals longer than any of the controls. CONCLUSIONS: LQT1 is associated with diminished chronotropic response and exaggerated prolongation of QT interval after exercise. LQT2 patients differ from LQT1 patients by having marked QT interval shortening and normal heart rate response to exercise. Observing QT duration during recovery enhances the clinical diagnosis of these LQTS types.
OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to evaluate the QT interval and heart rate responses to exercise and recovery in gene and mutation type-specific subgroups of long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients. BACKGROUND: Reduced heart rate and repolarization abnormalities are encountered among long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients. The most common types of LQTS are LQT1 and LQT2. METHODS: An exercise stress test was performed in 23 patients with a pore region mutation and in 22 patients with a C-terminal end mutation of the cardiac potassium channel gene causing LQT1 type of long QT syndrome (KVLQT1 gene), as well as in 20 patients with mutations of the cardiac potassium channel gene causing LQT2 type of long QT syndrome (HERG gene) and in 33 healthy relatives. The QT intervals were measured on electrocardiograms at rest and during and after exercise. QT intervals were compared at similar heart rates, and rate adaptation of QT was studied as QT/heart rate slopes. RESULTS: In contrast to the LQT2patients, achieved maximum heart rate was decreased in both LQT1patient groups, being only 76 +/- 5% of predicted in patients with pore region mutation of KvLQT1. The QT/heart rate slopes were significantly steeper in LQT2patients than in controls during exercise. During recovery, the QT/heart rate slopes were steeper in all LQTS groups than in controls, signifying that QT intervals lengthened excessively when heart rate decreased. At heart rates of 110 or 100 beats/min during recovery, all LQT1patients and 89% of LQT2patients had QT intervals longer than any of the controls. CONCLUSIONS:LQT1 is associated with diminished chronotropic response and exaggerated prolongation of QT interval after exercise. LQT2patients differ from LQT1patients by having marked QT interval shortening and normal heart rate response to exercise. Observing QT duration during recovery enhances the clinical diagnosis of these LQTS types.
Authors: Lee W Gemma; Gregory M Ward; Mary M Dettmer; Jennifer L Ball; Peter J Leo; Danielle N Doria; Elizabeth S Kaufman Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2011-06-02
Authors: Mackenzi Mbai; Sridharan Rajamani; Brian P Delisle; Blake D Anson; Corey Anderson; Jonathan C Makielski; Craig T January Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Peter F Aziz; Tammy S Wieand; Jamie Ganley; Jacqueline Henderson; Akash R Patel; V Ramesh Iyer; R Lee Vogel; Michael McBride; Victoria L Vetter; Maully J Shah Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2011-09-28
Authors: Paola A Lanfranchi; Michael J Ackerman; Tomas Kara; Abu S M Shamsuzzaman; Robert Wolk; Pavel Jurak; Raouf Amin; Virend K Somers Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Sara I Liin; Malin Silverå Ejneby; Rene Barro-Soria; Mark Alexander Skarsfeldt; Johan E Larsson; Frida Starck Härlin; Teija Parkkari; Bo Hjorth Bentzen; Nicole Schmitt; H Peter Larsson; Fredrik Elinder Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Roope Männikkö; G Overend; C Perrey; C L Gavaghan; J-P Valentin; J Morten; M Armstrong; C E Pollard Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Peter F Aziz; Tammy S Wieand; Jamie Ganley; Jacqueline Henderson; Michael McBride; Maully J Shah Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2013-01-20 Impact factor: 1.468