T M Doherty1, W Tang, R C Detrano. 1. Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and Saint John's Cardiovascular Research Center, Torrance, California 90502, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the significance of a specific feature of coronary atherosclerosis--coronary calcium--in asymptomatic black and white subjects with coronary risk factors. BACKGROUND: The natural history and clinical evolution of coronary atherosclerosis differs between blacks and whites. Differences in the underlying pathobiology of atherosclerosis may be one determinant of the ethnic variability in the clinical manifestation of coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: In 1,375 high-risk but asymptomatic subjects (93 blacks [6.8%] and 1,282 whites [93.2%]) with at least one risk factor but no prior evidence of coronary disease, we assessed coronary risk factors, calculated Framingham risk of a coronary event and evaluated coronary calcium with digital subtraction fluoroscopy. We then followed these subjects clinically for 70 +/- 13 months, noting the occurrence of the following coronary events: death due to coronary heart disease (CHD); myocardial infarction (MI); angina pectoris; and performance of coronary bypass or angioplasty. RESULTS: Risk factor profiles were similar in black and white subjects (6-year Framingham risk 15 +/- 7% in blacks, 14 +/- 8% in whites [NS]). Coronary calcium was present in 59.9% of white subjects but only 35.5% of black subjects (p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, after 70 months of follow-up, more blacks than whites (22 blacks [23.7%] vs. 190 whites [14.8%]; p = 0.04) suffered one of the following end points: CHD death, MI, angina or revascularization. The age, gender and coronary risk-adjusted odds ratio of black race for at least one event was 2.16 (95% CI 1.34 to 3.48). CONCLUSIONS: Despite having a lowered prevalence of coronary calcium than high risk whites, high risk blacks suffer more CHD events. Coronary calcium therefore does not carry the same pathobiologic significance in blacks that it does in whites, consistent with the concept that there are specific racial differences in the natural history of CHD and its evolution into clinically manifest events.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the significance of a specific feature of coronary atherosclerosis--coronary calcium--in asymptomatic black and white subjects with coronary risk factors. BACKGROUND: The natural history and clinical evolution of coronary atherosclerosis differs between blacks and whites. Differences in the underlying pathobiology of atherosclerosis may be one determinant of the ethnic variability in the clinical manifestation of coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: In 1,375 high-risk but asymptomatic subjects (93 blacks [6.8%] and 1,282 whites [93.2%]) with at least one risk factor but no prior evidence of coronary disease, we assessed coronary risk factors, calculated Framingham risk of a coronary event and evaluated coronary calcium with digital subtraction fluoroscopy. We then followed these subjects clinically for 70 +/- 13 months, noting the occurrence of the following coronary events: death due to coronary heart disease (CHD); myocardial infarction (MI); angina pectoris; and performance of coronary bypass or angioplasty. RESULTS: Risk factor profiles were similar in black and white subjects (6-year Framingham risk 15 +/- 7% in blacks, 14 +/- 8% in whites [NS]). Coronary calcium was present in 59.9% of white subjects but only 35.5% of black subjects (p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, after 70 months of follow-up, more blacks than whites (22 blacks [23.7%] vs. 190 whites [14.8%]; p = 0.04) suffered one of the following end points: CHD death, MI, angina or revascularization. The age, gender and coronary risk-adjusted odds ratio of black race for at least one event was 2.16 (95% CI 1.34 to 3.48). CONCLUSIONS: Despite having a lowered prevalence of coronary calcium than high risk whites, high risk blacks suffer more CHD events. Coronary calcium therefore does not carry the same pathobiologic significance in blacks that it does in whites, consistent with the concept that there are specific racial differences in the natural history of CHD and its evolution into clinically manifest events.
Authors: Lynne E Wagenknecht; Carl D Langefeld; Barry I Freedman; J Jeffery Carr; Donald W Bowden Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Alexandre C Pereira; Luz M Gomez; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Henrique Lane Staniak; Rodolfo Sharovsky; Murilo Foppa; Michael J Blaha; Isabela M Bensenor; Paulo A Lotufo Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Anna M Johnson; Kathryn M Rose; Glen H Elder; Lloyd E Chambless; Jay S Kaufman; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Prev Med Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Elisa Y Rhew; Susan M Manzi; Alan R Dyer; Amy H Kao; Natalya Danchenko; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; David D McPherson; William Pearce; Daniel Edmundowicz; George T Kondos; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman Journal: Transl Res Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 7.012
Authors: Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 2.357