OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of coronary artery calcium (CAC) across Framingham Risk Score (FRS) strata and therefore determine FRS levels at which asymptomatic, young to early middle-age individuals could potentially benefit from CAC screening. BACKGROUND: High CAC burden is associated with increased risk of coronary events beyond the FRS. Expert panel recommendations for CAC screening are based on data obtained in middle-age and older individuals. METHODS: We included 2,831 CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study participants with an age range of 33 to 45 years. The number needed to screen ([NNS] number of people in each FRS stratum who need to be screened to detect 1 person with a CAC score above the specified cut point) was used to assess the yield of screening for CAC. CAC prevalence was compared across FRS strata using a chi-square test. RESULTS: CAC scores >0 and ≥100 were present in 9.9% and 1.8% of participants, respectively. CAC prevalence and amount increased across higher FRS strata. A CAC score >0 was observed in 7.3%, 20.2%, 19.1%, and 44.8% of individuals with FRSs of 0 to 2.5%, 2.6% to 5%, 5.1% to 10%, and >10%, respectively (NNS = 14, 5, 5, and 2, respectively). A CAC score of ≥100 was observed in 1.3%, 2.4%, and 3.5% of those with FRSs of 0 to 2.5%, 2.6% to 5%, and 5.1% to 10%, respectively (NNS = 79, 41, and 29, respectively), but in 17.2% of those with an FRS >10% (NNS = 6). Similar trends were observed when findings were stratified by sex and race. CONCLUSIONS: In this young to early middle-age cohort, we observed concordance between CAC prevalence/amount and FRS strata. Within this group, the yield of screening and possibility of identifying those with a high CAC burden (CAC score of ≥100) is low in those with an FRS of ≤10%, but considerable in those with an FRS >10%.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of coronary artery calcium (CAC) across Framingham Risk Score (FRS) strata and therefore determine FRS levels at which asymptomatic, young to early middle-age individuals could potentially benefit from CAC screening. BACKGROUND: High CAC burden is associated with increased risk of coronary events beyond the FRS. Expert panel recommendations for CAC screening are based on data obtained in middle-age and older individuals. METHODS: We included 2,831 CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study participants with an age range of 33 to 45 years. The number needed to screen ([NNS] number of people in each FRS stratum who need to be screened to detect 1 person with a CAC score above the specified cut point) was used to assess the yield of screening for CAC. CAC prevalence was compared across FRS strata using a chi-square test. RESULTS: CAC scores >0 and ≥100 were present in 9.9% and 1.8% of participants, respectively. CAC prevalence and amount increased across higher FRS strata. A CAC score >0 was observed in 7.3%, 20.2%, 19.1%, and 44.8% of individuals with FRSs of 0 to 2.5%, 2.6% to 5%, 5.1% to 10%, and >10%, respectively (NNS = 14, 5, 5, and 2, respectively). A CAC score of ≥100 was observed in 1.3%, 2.4%, and 3.5% of those with FRSs of 0 to 2.5%, 2.6% to 5%, and 5.1% to 10%, respectively (NNS = 79, 41, and 29, respectively), but in 17.2% of those with an FRS >10% (NNS = 6). Similar trends were observed when findings were stratified by sex and race. CONCLUSIONS: In this young to early middle-age cohort, we observed concordance between CAC prevalence/amount and FRS strata. Within this group, the yield of screening and possibility of identifying those with a high CAC burden (CAC score of ≥100) is low in those with an FRS of ≤10%, but considerable in those with an FRS >10%.
Authors: Philip Greenland; Joseph S Alpert; George A Beller; Emelia J Benjamin; Matthew J Budoff; Zahi A Fayad; Elyse Foster; Mark A Hlatky; John McB Hodgson; Frederick G Kushner; Michael S Lauer; Leslee J Shaw; Sidney C Smith; Allen J Taylor; William S Weintraub; Nanette K Wenger; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith; Jeffrey L Anderson; Nancy Albert; Christopher E Buller; Mark A Creager; Steven M Ettinger; Robert A Guyton; Jonathan L Halperin; Judith S Hochman; Frederick G Kushner; Rick Nishimura; E Magnus Ohman; Richard L Page; William G Stevenson; Lynn G Tarkington; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Anne B Newman; Barbara L Naydeck; Jeff Whittle; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Daniel Edmundowicz; Lewis H Kuller Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Tamar S Polonsky; Robyn L McClelland; Neal W Jorgensen; Diane E Bild; Gregory L Burke; Alan D Guerci; Philip Greenland Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Timothy P Murphy; Rajoo Dhangana; Michael J Pencina; Abdul M Zafar; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; Leslee J Shaw; Johanna Kim; Lisa Miranda-Peats; Nathan D Wong; Jamal S Rana; Raza Orakzai; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Louise E J Thomson; Donna Polk; James Min; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Tochi M Okwuosa; Philip Greenland; Hongyan Ning; Kiang Liu; Diane E Bild; Gregory L Burke; John Eng; Donald M Lloyd-Jones Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: H A Ashton; M J Buxton; N E Day; L G Kim; T M Marteau; R A P Scott; S G Thompson; N M Walker Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-11-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Darcy S Majka; Kiang Liu; Richard M Pope; Elizabeth W Karlson; Thanh-Huyen T Vu; Marius Teodorescu; Rowland W Chang Journal: Inflamm Res Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.575
Authors: Wesley T O'Neal; Jimmy T Efird; Waqas T Qureshi; Joseph Yeboah; Alvaro Alonso; Susan R Heckbert; Saman Nazarian; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Philip Greenland; Michael J Blaha; Matthew J Budoff; Raimund Erbel; Karol E Watson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Wesley T O'Neal; Jimmy T Efird; Farah Z Dawood; Joseph Yeboah; Alvaro Alonso; Susan R Heckbert; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 2.778