Literature DB >> 10483541

Accurate prediction of term birth weight from prospectively measurable maternal characteristics.

G G Nahum1, H Stanislaw, B J Huffaker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether accurate prediction of individual term birth weight is possible based on maternal characteristics routinely measured remote from term in healthy women. STUDY
DESIGN: Two hundred sixty-two nonsmoking, nondiabetic, white gravidas with uncomplicated term gestations were studied. A cross-validated, split-sample multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of seven maternal characteristics and two fetal characteristics to identify an optimal combination for accurately estimating birth weight. Fifty-nine terms were assessed for predictive accuracy.
RESULTS: Significant predictors of term birth weight were gestational age, parity, fetal sex, maternal height, maternal weight and third-trimester maternal weight gain rate. Combinations of these prospectively measurable variables explained 33% of the variance in birth weight and predicted birth weight to within +/- 267 g (+/- 7.6% of individual birth weight). Term fetal macrosomia was predicted with 80% sensitivity using a prediction cutoff of 3,550 g.
CONCLUSION: Individual term birth weight can be accurately predicted in normal gravidas using routinely measurable maternal characteristics. Birth weight estimates using our equation are both prospectively derivable from the beginning of the third trimester and more accurate than any previously devised algorithms, including those that incorporate fetal ultrasonographic data. Our equation can also identify pregnancies at risk for fetal macrosomia so that the timing and mode of delivery may be prospectively modified to minimize peripartum risks to both fetus and mother.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10483541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  6 in total

1.  Predicting large fetuses at birth: do multiple ultrasound examinations and longitudinal statistical modelling improve prediction?

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Sungduk Kim; Jagteshwar Grewal; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 2.  Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mario Merialdi; Lawrence D Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Percentage change in antenatal body mass index as a predictor of neonatal macrosomia.

Authors:  Chad A Asplund; Dean A Seehusen; Terra L Callahan; Cara Olsen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Clinical versus sonographic estimation of foetal weight in southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Akinola S Shittu; Oluwafemi Kuti; Ernest O Orji; Niyi O Makinde; Solomon O Ogunniy; Oluwagbemiga O Ayoola; Salami S Sule
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Christoph Weiss; Peter Oppelt; Richard Bernhard Mayer
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 6.  Biomarkers for Macrosomia Prediction in Pregnancies Affected by Diabetes.

Authors:  Sofia Nahavandi; Jas-Mine Seah; Alexis Shub; Christine Houlihan; Elif I Ekinci
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.555

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.