Literature DB >> 10482704

Correlations between esophageal diseases and manometric length: a study of 617 patients.

Z T Awad1, P Watson, C J Filipi, R E Marsh, T Tomonaga, Y Shiino, S Bhatia, W Boedefeld.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the length of the esophagus and assess its relationship to sex, weight, age, height, and various esophageal disorders. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 617 esophageal manometric studies, which included 51 normal control subjects (27 males and 24 females) and 566 patients (297 males and 269 females) with esophageal disorders (50 with achalasia, 6 with diffuse esophageal spasm, 64 with strictures, 38 with nutcracker esophagus, 398 with gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD] with positive 24-hour pH monitoring, and 66 with possible GERD but negative 24-hour pH monitoring). Manometry was performed in all of them by the station pull-through technique. The length of the esophagus was defined as the distance between the proximal end of the upper esophageal sphincter and the distal end of the lower esophageal sphincter. In the control group the mean (+/- standard deviation) length of the esophagus was 28.3 +/- 2.41 cm. In patients with esophageal disorders the mean length of the esophagus was 28.0 +/- 2.87 cm. Length of the esophagus is related to height but not to weight, sex, age, diffuse esophageal spasm, or nutcracker esophagus. Achalasia is associated with a longer esophagus, and GERD is associated with a shorter esophagus. Stricture is associated with a shorter esophagus, but this is in part due to the association between stricture and GERD. Patients with possible GERD but negative 24-hour pH monitoring have an esophageal length similar to that of GERD patients with positive 24-hour pH monitoring. Patients with GERD and stricture formation showed esophageal shortening in shorter patients. Achalasia, GERD, and GERD with stricture formation influence esophageal length. GERD-related strictures shorten the esophagus more significantly in short patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10482704     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80101-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  18 in total

1.  The distance to the stomach for feeding tube placement in children predicted from regression on height.

Authors:  J Beckstrand; M Ellett; J Welch; J Dye; C Games; S Henrie; R S Barlow
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Laparoscopic Collis gastroplasty is the treatment of choice for the shortened esophagus.

Authors:  L L Swanstrom; D R Marcus; G Q Galloway
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Determination of esophageal probe insertion length based on standing and sitting height.

Authors:  I B Mekjavić; M E Rempel
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-07

Review 4.  The normal esophagus.

Authors:  F G DeNardi; R H Riddell
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Observations on oesophageal length.

Authors:  G J Kalloor; A H Deshpande; J L Collis
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Esophagogastric mucosal junction (EGMJ): its location as measured by endoscopy.

Authors:  E Scapa; E Broide; M Waron; E Klinowski; J Eshchar
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1997-04

7.  Intrathoracic fundoplication for reflux stricture associated with short oesophagus.

Authors:  K Moghissi
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Massive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management.

Authors:  D E Maziak; T R Todd; F G Pearson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Recurrent hiatal hernia: management by thoracoabdominal total fundoplication gastroplasty.

Authors:  R D Henderson; G Marryatt
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Correlation of esophageal lengths with measurable external parameters.

Authors:  T J Song; Y H Kim; H S Ryu; J H Hyun
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.884

View more
  4 in total

1.  Short esophagus or bad dissected esophagus? An experimental cadaveric study.

Authors:  Fernando Augusto Mardiros Herbella; Jose Carlos Del Grande; Ramiro Colleoni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Cells with Cancer-associated Mutations Overtake Our Tissues as We Age.

Authors:  Edward J Evans; James DeGregori
Journal:  Aging Cancer       Date:  2021-10-21

3.  Proximal sensor data from routine dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring is often inaccurate.

Authors:  Matt McCollough; Abdul Jabbar; Robert Cacchione; Jeff W Allen; Steve Harrell; John M Wo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Ideal Anatomical Landmark Points for Thoracic Esophagus Segmentation in the Chinese Population.

Authors:  Di Lu; Xiuyu Ji; Jintao Zhan; Jianxue Zhai; Tingxiao Fang; Siyang Feng; Xiguang Liu; Lin Yu; Zhiming Chen; Zhizhi Wang; Xuanzhen Wu; Sue Liu; Hua Wu; Kaican Cai
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.