Literature DB >> 10482701

Serial endoscopic ultrasound in the assessment of response to chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus.

D J Bowrey1, G W Clark, S A Roberts, A B Hawthorne, T S Maughan, G T Williams, P D Carey.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess whether endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) could accurately measure the locoregional response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. Seventeen patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent EUS examination before and on completion of chemoradiotherapy. The EUS findings were correlated with the results of histologic examination of the esophagectomy specimen. The accuracy of EUS in these patients was compared with the accuracy of EUS in a control group of 17 patients treated by surgery alone. In 16 of 17 patients EUS-determined tumor (T) stage was unchanged following treatment and in one patient there was T-stage progression. No patient demonstrated downstaging of the primary tumor according to classical EUS criteria. In 10 of 17 patients a reduction in maximum tumor depth of >/=2 mm was observed (range 2 to 18 mm). Histologic examination revealed that four patients with squamous cell carcinoma had experienced a complete pathologic response. These four patients had significantly lower posttreatment EUS tumor depths compared to patients without a complete response (5.0 vs. 9.0 mm; P <0.05). Based on the post-treatment EUS examination, the accuracy was 59% for T stage and 59&percnt for node (N) stage. The accuracy of EUS in patients treated by surgery alone was 94% for T stage and 94% for N stage, indicating a significant reduction in the accuracy of EUS in patients following chemoradiotherapy (P <0.05). The accuracy of EUS examination in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus treated by chemoradiotherapy was poor. EUS did not detect downstaging of the primary tumor, even in the presence of a complete pathologic response. EUS assessment of maximum tumor depth was a better measure of response to therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10482701     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80098-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  15 in total

1.  Esophageal carcinoma: esophageal ultrasound assessment of preoperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  T W Rice; G A Boyce; M V Sivak; D J Adelstein; T J Kirby
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer: a review of literature results.

Authors:  T Rösch
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1995-07

3.  Response to chemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  H J Dittler; U Fink; G R Siewert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  A combined modality approach to the management of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  B M Smithers; P Devitt; G G Jamieson; J Bessell; D Gotley; P G Gill; M Neely; D J Joseph; E K Yeoh; B Burmeister; J W Denham
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  The role of neoadjuvant therapy in surgically resectable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  S G Swisher; E C Holmes; K K Hunt; J E Doty; M J Zinner; D W McFadden
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-08

6.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Survival of patients with carcinoma of the esophagus treated with combined-modality therapy.

Authors:  W G Wolfe; A L Vaughn; H F Seigler; J W Hathorn; K A Leopold; F G Duhaylongsod
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Endosonography for preoperative locoregional staging of esophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Grimm; K F Binmoeller; K Hamper; J Koch; D Henne-Bruns; N Soehendra
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Prolonged survival follows resection of oesophageal SCC downstaged by prior chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J R Bessell; P G Devitt; P G Gill; S Goyal; G G Jamieson
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1996-04

10.  Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ECF) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastro-oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  A A Melcher; D Mort; T S Maughan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  The role of endoscopic ultrasound in assessing tumor response and staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Subhasis Misra; Mark Choi; Alan S Livingstone; Dido Franceschi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Different accuracy of endosonographic tumor staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Wolfram Bohle; Michaela Kasper; Wolfram G Zoller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasonography in staging diagnosis of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xiaodong Li; Yixiao Wang; Min Kong; Jiang Lin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-08

4.  Definitive chemoradiation in patients with inoperable oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  T D L Crosby; A E Brewster; A Borley; L Perschky; P Kehagioglou; J Court; T S Maughan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.