Literature DB >> 10479829

Decision making under time pressure: an independent test of sequential sampling models.

I E Dror1, J R Busemeyer, B Basola.   

Abstract

Choice probability and choice response time data from a risk-taking decision-making task were compared with predictions made by a sequential sampling model. The behavioral data, consistent with the model, showed that participants were less likely to take an action as risk levels increased, and that time pressure did not have a uniform effect on choice probability. Under time pressure, participants were more conservative at the lower risk levels but were more prone to take risks at the higher levels of risk. This crossover interaction reflected a reduction of the threshold within a single decision strategy rather than a switching of decision strategies. Response time data, as predicted by the model, showed that participants took more time to make decisions at the moderate risk levels and that time pressure reduced response time across all risk levels, but particularly at the those risk levels that took longer time with no pressure. Finally, response time data were used to rule out the hypothesis that time pressure effects could be explained by a fast-guess strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479829     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  7 in total

1.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; T Van Zandt; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Computational analyses in cognitive neuroscience: in defense of biological implausibility.

Authors:  I E Dror; D P Gallogly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

3.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Decision making under uncertainty: a comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models.

Authors:  J R Busemeyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.

Authors:  J R Busemeyer; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Real and laboratory gambling, sensation-seeking and arousal.

Authors:  G Anderson; R I Brown
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1984-08

7.  Age differences in decision making: to take a risk or not?

Authors:  I E Dror; M Katona; K Mungur
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.140

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Computational analyses in cognitive neuroscience: in defense of biological implausibility.

Authors:  I E Dror; D P Gallogly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

2.  MDFT account of decision making under time pressure.

Authors:  Adele Diederich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Free choice tasks as random generation tasks: an investigation through working memory manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Michael Dambacher; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-03

Review 5.  Time and decision making in humans.

Authors:  Florian Klapproth
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  Sequential sampling and paradoxes of risky choice.

Authors:  Sudeep Bhatia
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06-05

7.  Influences on the adoption of patient safety innovation in primary care: a qualitative exploration of staff perspectives.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Paramjit Gill; Tony Avery; Stephen Campbell; Katherine Perryman; Kate Marsden; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  The influence of time pressure on adherence to guidelines in primary care: an experimental study.

Authors:  Evangelia Tsiga; Efharis Panagopoulou; Nick Sevdalis; Anthony Montgomery; Alexios Benos
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods.

Authors:  Alaa Althubaiti
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-05-04

10.  The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics.

Authors:  Leonidas Spiliopoulos; Andreas Ortmann
Journal:  Exp Econ       Date:  2017-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.