Literature DB >> 10479819

Recency and lexical preferences in Spanish.

E Gibson1, N J Pearlmutter, V Torrens.   

Abstract

One experiment provided evidence in support of Gibson, Pearlmutter, Canseco-Gonzalez, and Hickok's (1996) claim that a recency preference applies to Spanish relative clause attachments, contrary to the claim made by Cuetos and Mitchell (1988). Spanish speakers read stimuli involving either two or three potential attachment sites in which the same lexical content of the two-site conditions appeared in a different structural configuration in the three-site conditions. High attachment was easier than low attachment when only two sites were present, but low attachment was preferred over high attachment, which was in turn preferred over middle attachment, when three sites were present. The experiment replicated earlier results and showed that (1) attachment preferences are determined in part by a preference to attach recently/low, and (2) lexical biases are insufficient to explain attachment preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479819     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  12 in total

1.  Another word on parsing relative clauses: eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English.

Authors:  M Carreiras; C Clifton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

Review 3.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

4.  Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism.

Authors:  E Gibson; N Pearlmutter; E Canseco-Gonzalez; G Hickok
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-04

5.  Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish.

Authors:  F Cuetos; D C Mitchell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-10

6.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints.

Authors:  M Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1995-06

7.  Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs.

Authors:  E Gilboy; J M Sopena; C Clifton; L Frazier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1995-02

8.  Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English.

Authors:  M Carreiras; C Clifton
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter; J D Woolley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-06

10.  The relationship between the frequency and the processing complexity of linguistic structure.

Authors:  E Gibson; C T Schütze; A Salomon
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Testing the online reading effects of emotionality on relative clause attachment.

Authors:  Javier García-Orza; José Manuel Gavilán; Isabel Fraga; Pilar Ferré
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-04-26

2.  The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses.

Authors:  Roger Levy; Evelina Fedorenko; Edward Gibson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.