Literature DB >> 10478693

Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment.

S B Issenberg1, W C McGaghie, I R Hart, J W Mayer, J M Felner, E R Petrusa, R A Waugh, D D Brown, R R Safford, I H Gessner, D L Gordon, G A Ewy.   

Abstract

Changes in medical practice that limit instruction time and patient availability, the expanding options for diagnosis and management, and advances in technology are contributing to greater use of simulation technology in medical education. Four areas of high-technology simulations currently being used are laparoscopic techniques, which provide surgeons with an opportunity to enhance their motor skills without risk to patients; a cardiovascular disease simulator, which can be used to simulate cardiac conditions; multimedia computer systems, which includes patient-centered, case-based programs that constitute a generalist curriculum in cardiology; and anesthesia simulators, which have controlled responses that vary according to numerous possible scenarios. Some benefits of simulation technology include improvements in certain surgical technical skills, in cardiovascular examination skills, and in acquisition and retention of knowledge compared with traditional lectures. These systems help to address the problem of poor skills training and proficiency and may provide a method for physicians to become self-directed lifelong learners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10478693     DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.9.861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  113 in total

1.  The role of multimedia interactive programs in training for laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  B J Ramshaw; D Young; I Garcha; F Shuler; R Wilson; J G White; T Duncan; E Mason
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Simulation technology in anesthesiology.

Authors:  M Rosenberg
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2000

3.  Exploring the boundaries of plausibility: empirical study of a key problem in the design of computer-based clinical simulations.

Authors:  Charles P Friedman; Guido G Gatti; Gwendolyn C Murphy; Timothy M Franz; Paul L Fine; Paul S Heckerling; Thomas M Miller
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Elaine R Cohen; Jeffrey H Barsuk; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 5.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Support of daily ECG procedures in a cardiology department via the integration of an existing clinical database and a commercial ECG management system.

Authors:  Franco Chiarugi; David Lombardi; Philip J Lees; Catherine E Chronaki; Manolis Tsiknakis; Stelios C Orphanoudakis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training.

Authors:  J B Cooper; V R Taqueti
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

8.  Disparity between resident and attending physician perceptions of intraoperative supervision and education.

Authors:  Kimberly L Levinson; Joyce N Barlin; Kristiina Altman; Andrew J Satin
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-03

9.  High-fidelity simulation in post-graduate training and assessment: an Irish perspective.

Authors:  M G Langdon; A J Cunningham
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Novel simulator for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.