J T Snook1, S Park, G Williams, N Lee. 1. Department of Human Nutrition and Food Management, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA. snook.3@osu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine relative effects of diets high in synthetic sources of myristic (14:0), palmitic (16:0) or stearic (18:0) acid on concentrations and metabolism of serum lipoproteins. DESIGN:Eighteen healthy women participated in a three-way cross-over study for five week periods separated by seven week washout periods, diets were assigned in random order. SUBJECTS:Premenopausal women, not on medication, were from three races (Caucasian, African-American, Asian) and four apolipoprotein E phenotype groups (3/3, 3/2, 4/3, and 4/2). INTERVENTION: During the first week the subjects consumed a baseline diet providing 11 energy (en)% saturated fat, 10en% polyunsaturated fat and 14en% monounsaturated fat. Followed by test diets with 19en% saturated fat (including 14en% test saturated fatty acid), 3en% polyunsaturated fat, and 14en% monounsaturated fat for four weeks. Synthetic fats (trimyristin, tripalmitin, and tristearin) were used in blends with natural fats and oils. RESULTS:Mean concentrations of serum total, esterified and LDL cholesterol were significantly lower after 18:0 than after 16:0 (n = 16-18, P < 0.01 for treatment effect). Myristic acid (14:0) had an intermediate effect. Receptor-mediated degradation of 125I-LDL in mononuclear cells obtained from the subjects was lower after 16:0 than after 14:0 and 18:0 (n = 16-18, P=0.05 for treatment effect). Differences in the digestibilities of the fats were not a major factor in the results. Strong cholesterolemic responses to the 16:0 diet were partly explained by apoE phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: As noted previously, stearic acid was neutral compared to 14:0 and 16:0. In contrast to studies involving natural fats, 14:0, fed as a synthetic triglyceride, was less cholesterolemic than 16:0 in a majority of subjects. ApoE phenotype influenced the cholesterolemic response particularly when diets high in 16:0 were eaten.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To determine relative effects of diets high in synthetic sources of myristic (14:0), palmitic (16:0) or stearic (18:0) acid on concentrations and metabolism of serum lipoproteins. DESIGN: Eighteen healthy women participated in a three-way cross-over study for five week periods separated by seven week washout periods, diets were assigned in random order. SUBJECTS: Premenopausal women, not on medication, were from three races (Caucasian, African-American, Asian) and four apolipoprotein E phenotype groups (3/3, 3/2, 4/3, and 4/2). INTERVENTION: During the first week the subjects consumed a baseline diet providing 11 energy (en)% saturated fat, 10en% polyunsaturated fat and 14en% monounsaturated fat. Followed by test diets with 19en% saturated fat (including 14en% test saturated fatty acid), 3en% polyunsaturated fat, and 14en% monounsaturated fat for four weeks. Synthetic fats (trimyristin, tripalmitin, and tristearin) were used in blends with natural fats and oils. RESULTS: Mean concentrations of serum total, esterified and LDL cholesterol were significantly lower after 18:0 than after 16:0 (n = 16-18, P < 0.01 for treatment effect). Myristic acid (14:0) had an intermediate effect. Receptor-mediated degradation of 125I-LDL in mononuclear cells obtained from the subjects was lower after 16:0 than after 14:0 and 18:0 (n = 16-18, P=0.05 for treatment effect). Differences in the digestibilities of the fats were not a major factor in the results. Strong cholesterolemic responses to the 16:0 diet were partly explained by apoE phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: As noted previously, stearic acid was neutral compared to 14:0 and 16:0. In contrast to studies involving natural fats, 14:0, fed as a synthetic triglyceride, was less cholesterolemic than 16:0 in a majority of subjects. ApoE phenotype influenced the cholesterolemic response particularly when diets high in 16:0 were eaten.
Authors: Sarah E E Berry; Rebecca Woodward; Christabelle Yeoh; George J Miller; Thomas A B Sanders Journal: Lipids Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 1.880
Authors: Penny M Kris-Etherton; Amy E Griel; Tricia L Psota; Sarah K Gebauer; Jun Zhang; Terry D Etherton Journal: Lipids Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 1.880
Authors: Carmen Lambert; Judit Cubedo; Teresa Padró; Joan Sánchez-Hernández; Rosa M Antonijoan; Antonio Perez; Lina Badimon Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 5.717