Literature DB >> 10476847

Glenoid cancellous bone strength and modulus.

C Anglin1, P Tolhurst, U P Wyss, D R Pichora.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine the strength and modulus of glenoid cancellous bone, including regional variations. The motivations were: to select a suitable bone substitute for standardized testing of glenoid prosthesis loosening, to assist in shoulder prosthesis design and to provide input data for finite element analyses. Ten glenoids from eight cadavers (mean age, 81) were tested by in situ indentation. Mean strength ranged from 6.7 to 17 MPa for the ten glenoids, the overall mean being 10.3 MPa. Mean E moduli ranged from 67 to 171 MPa for the individual glenoids, the overall mean being 99 MPa. These values are likely at the lower end of what would be expected for normal bone since strength and modulus decrease with age and the available specimens were older. These values may be appropriate for prosthesis design, however, since mechanical properties are reduced in rheumatoid arthritic bone. Regional trends were very similar for modulus and strength. The strongest region was postero-superior. The central column, correlating with the keel position in many glenoid components, was weaker than both the anterior and posterior regions but deeper. A large drop in strength and modulus below the subchondral layer emphasizes the importance of maintaining this layer during prosthetic replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10476847     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00087-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  13 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of the strain distribution in the humeral head tubercles during abduction: comparison of young and osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Ph Clavert; M Zerah; J Krier; P Mille; J F Kempf; J L Kahn
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Version Correction via Eccentric Reaming Compromises Remaining Bone Quality in B2 Glenoids: A Computational Study.

Authors:  Xiang Chen; Akhil S Reddy; Andreas Kontaxis; Daniel S Choi; Timothy Wright; David M Dines; Russell F Warren; Julien Berhouet; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Biometrical analysis of the shoulder joint regarding glenoid implant dimensions for arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jörn Kircher; Bernd Bittersohl; Christoph Zilkens; Achim Hedtmann; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Glenoid bone loss in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amar Malhas; Abbas Rashid; Dave Copas; Steve Bale; Ian Trail
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-05-06

5.  Comparative stress analysis of delayed and immediate loading of a single implant in an edentulous maxilla model.

Authors:  Jie Gao; Yasuyuki Matsushita; Daisuke Esaki; Tatsuya Matsuzaki; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2014-05-14

6.  Stability of small pegs for cementless implant fixation.

Authors:  Diogo M Geraldes; Ulrich Hansen; Jonathan Jeffers; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  No correlation between radiolucency and biomechanical stability of keeled and pegged glenoid components.

Authors:  Andreas Voss; Knut Beitzel; Elifho Obopilwe; Stefan Buchmann; John Apostolakos; Jessica Di Venere; Michael Nowak; Mark P Cote; Anthony A Romeo; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  A Facile Flow-Casting Production of Bioactive Glass Coatings on Porous Titanium for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Haiou Yang; Qijie Zhu; Hongfei Qi; Xianhu Liu; Meixia Ma; Qiang Chen
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  A comparison of pegged vs. keeled glenoid components regarding functional and radiographic outcomes in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur Welsher; Chetan Gohal; Kim Madden; Bruce Miller; Asheesh Bedi; Bashar Alolabi; Moin Khan
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-07-11

10.  Trabecular architecture in the forelimb epiphyses of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia).

Authors:  Eli Amson; Patrick Arnold; Anneke H van Heteren; Aurore Canoville; John A Nyakatura
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.