Literature DB >> 10474108

Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.

B P Loftus1, J Artun, J I Nicholls, T A Alonzo, J A Stoner.   

Abstract

Frictional forces during simulated sliding tooth movement were measured with a model that was representative of the clinical condition. The model allowed tipping of the tooth until contact was established between the arch wire and diagonally opposite corners of the bracket wings; it also allowed rotation until the wire contacted opposite corners of the ligature tie, or the buccal shield with self-ligating brackets, and the base of the slot. Conventional and self-ligating stainless steel brackets as well as conventional ceramic brackets, and ceramic brackets with a stainless steel slot, all with 0.022 inch bracket slot, were tested with 0.019 x 0.025 inch arch wires of stainless steel, nickel titanium, and beta titanium. Each of the 12 bracket-arch wire combinations was tested 10 times. No significant interaction was detected between brackets and arch wires (P = .89), but the bracket and arch wire effects were significant (P < .001). The pairwise differences between conventional and self-ligating stainless steel brackets and ceramic brackets with stainless steel slot were not significant. However, the conventional ceramic brackets generated significantly higher friction than the other brackets tested. Beta titanium arch wires produced higher frictional forces than nickel titanium arch wires, but no significant differences were found between each of the two and stainless steel arch wires. Attempts to identify differences in surface scratches of the arch wires produced by the different brackets were unsuccessful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10474108     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70247-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  24 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Properties, Load Deflection Rate and Surface Characteristics of Different Coloured TMA Archwires - An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Arul Pradeep Aloysius; Devaki Vijayalakshmi; Nagachandran Kandasamy Soundararajan; Vijaykumar Neelam Manohar; Nayeemullah Khan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  The Effects of In-Office Reconditioning on the Slot Dimensions and Static Frictional Resistance of Stainless Steel Brackets.

Authors:  Rohini Iluru; Chaitanya Nellore; Praveen Kumar Reddy Karnati; Ashok Kumar Thalapaneni; Vijay Bhaskar Myla; Konda Ramyasree; Mandava Prasad
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

3.  Archwire depth is a significant parameter in the frictional resistance of active and interactive, but not passive, self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Christa L Oliver; John Daskalogiannakis; Bryan D Tompson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Friction behavior and other material properties of nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum archwires following electrochemical surface refinement.

Authors:  Miriam Julia Meier; Christoph Bourauel; Jan Roehlike; Susanne Reimann; Ludger Keilig; Bert Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  A comparative evaluation of rate of space closure after extraction using E-chain and stretched modules in bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion cases.

Authors:  Rajat Mitra; S M Londhe; Prasanna Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

6.  The leveling effectiveness of self-ligating and conventional brackets for complex tooth malalignments.

Authors:  Magali Fansa; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics.

Authors:  A Alper Oz; Nursel Arici; Selim Arici
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  A comparison of resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets under an increasing applied moment.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Effect of applied moment on resistance to sliding among esthetic self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; Rick W Fuchs; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Rates of tooth movement and bone remodeling activity: Self-ligating versus conventional brackets.

Authors:  Leonard-Euler-Andrade-Gomes do Nascimento; Matheus-Melo Pithon; Antônio-Carlos de O Ruellas; Eduardo-Sant Anna Franzotti; Antônio-Cruz-Gonçalves Filho; Margareth-Maria-Gomes de Souza; Ana-Maria Bolognese
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.