Literature DB >> 10472779

Maintenance treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate in patients with advanced breast cancer responding to chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial. Essen Breast Cancer Study Group.

O Kloke1, U Klaassen, C Oberhoff, G Hartwich, J Szanto, E Wolf, M Heckmann, R Huhn, L Stephan, U Schnepper, G M Donsbach, C Bechtel, R Rudolph, A Berke, D Borquez, I Hawig, H Hirche, A E Schindler, S Seeber, R Becher.   

Abstract

The purpose of this randomized phase III trial was to study whether medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) maintenance treatment prolongs the time to progression in advanced breast cancer patients responding to an induction chemotherapy. Patients with progressive advanced breast cancer previously untreated with anthracylines and progestins were given epirubicin (30 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (2 g/m2) on days 1 and 8 at 3-weekly intervals. Patients without disease progression after 6 cycles of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive, until progression, either no treatment or MPA at a daily total dose of 500 mg. Ninety patients were randomized: 46 to the MPA arm and 44 to the observation arm. Median time to progression was longer in the MPA arm: 4.9 months versus 3.7 months in the intent-to-treat analysis (p = 0.02), and 4.9 months versus 3.0 months in the secondary efficacy analysis (p = 0.012). Seven patients were removed from MPA due to side effects. The changes in patient-rated quality of life scores were similar in both groups. The median length of survival from randomization was 17.4 months for patients receiving MPA and 18.3 months for patients randomized to observation (p = 0.39). In conclusion, in patients with advanced breast cancer achieving remission or non-progression with 6 cycles of epirubicin and ifosfamide chemotherapy, MPA maintenance treatment led to a significant, though modest, prolongation of the time to progression without affecting overall survival of the study patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10472779     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006169012544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  5 in total

Review 1.  Contraception for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Rachel Hess; James Trussell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A Phase II Study of Fulvestrant 500 mg as Maintenance Therapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer After First-Line Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Qiufan Zheng; Wen Xia; Quchang Ouyang; Danmei Pang; Zhongyu Yuan; Yanxia Shi; Roujun Peng; Qianyi Lu; Shusen Wang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-12-08

3.  Patterns of treatment and outcome with 500-mg fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-life multicenter Italian experience.

Authors:  Raffaella Palumbo; Federico Sottotetti; Erica Quaquarini; Anna Gambaro; Antonella Ferzi; Barbara Tagliaferri; Cristina Teragni; Luca Licata; Francesco Serra; Pietro Lapidari; Antonio Bernardo
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  Maintenance hormonal treatment improves progression free survival after a first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Armelle Dufresne; Xavier Pivot; Christophe Tournigand; Thomas Facchini; Thierry Alweeg; Loic Chaigneau; Aimery De Gramont
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Hormonal therapy might be a better choice as maintenance treatment than capecitabine after response to first-line capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Chen; Feng Du; Ruo-Xi Hong; Jia-Yu Wang; Yang Luo; Qing Li; Ying Fan; Bing-He Xu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.