Literature DB >> 33245164

A Phase II Study of Fulvestrant 500 mg as Maintenance Therapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer After First-Line Chemotherapy.

Fei Xu1,2,3, Qiufan Zheng1,2,3, Wen Xia1,2,3, Quchang Ouyang4, Danmei Pang5, Zhongyu Yuan1,2,3, Yanxia Shi1,2,3, Roujun Peng1,2,3, Qianyi Lu1,2,3, Shusen Wang1,2,3.   

Abstract

LESSONS LEARNED: Fulvestrant 500 mg maintenance therapy showed a clinical benefit rate of 76% and median progression-free survival of 16.1 months in patients who achieved objective responses or disease control after first-line chemotherapy. Adverse events with fulvestrant maintenance therapy were consistent with the known safety profile of the drug.
BACKGROUND: Evidence for maintenance hormonal therapy after chemotherapy for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg maintenance therapy in patients after first-line chemotherapy.
METHODS: We enrolled postmenopausal women with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who attained tumor responses or disease control with four to eight cycles of chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Fulvestrant 500 mg was injected on days 1, 15, and 29 and every 28 (±3) days thereafter. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR); the secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.
RESULTS: We included 58 patients; the median follow-up duration was 32.6 months. The CBR since commencing fulvestrant maintenance therapy was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63%-86%), and ORR was 14% (95% CI, 6%-25%); eight patients achieved partial response. The median PFS for fulvestrant maintenance therapy was 16.1 months (95% CI, 10.3-21.0 months). Thirty-nine patients (67%) reported at least one adverse event, of which most were grade 1/2, whereas three patients (5%) reported grade 3 adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Fulvestrant 500 mg is a feasible and promising hormonal maintenance strategy in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have no disease progression after first-line chemotherapy. © AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Fulvestrant; Hormonal therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33245164      PMCID: PMC8100565          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  21 in total

1.  A phase III trial of exemestane plus bevacizumab maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer after first-line taxane and bevacizumab: a GINECO group study.

Authors:  O Trédan; P Follana; I Moullet; C Cropet; S Trager-Maury; J Dauba; S Lavau-Denes; V Diéras; D Béal-Ardisson; M Gouttebel; H Orfeuvre; L Stefani; C Jouannaud; F Bürki; T Petit; E Guardiola; C Becuwe; E Blot; E Pujade-Lauraine; T Bachelot
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 1.2017.

Authors:  William J Gradishar; Benjamin O Anderson; Ron Balassanian; Sarah L Blair; Harold J Burstein; Amy Cyr; Anthony D Elias; William B Farrar; Andres Forero; Sharon Hermes Giordano; Matthew P Goetz; Lori J Goldstein; Steven J Isakoff; Janice Lyons; P Kelly Marcom; Ingrid A Mayer; Beryl McCormick; Meena S Moran; Ruth M O'Regan; Sameer A Patel; Lori J Pierce; Elizabeth C Reed; Kilian E Salerno; Lee S Schwartzberg; Amy Sitapati; Karen Lisa Smith; Mary Lou Smith; Hatem Soliman; George Somlo; Melinda Telli; John H Ward; Dorothy A Shead; Rashmi Kumar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas C Turner; Jungsil Ro; Fabrice André; Sherene Loi; Sunil Verma; Hiroji Iwata; Nadia Harbeck; Sibylle Loibl; Cynthia Huang Bartlett; Ke Zhang; Carla Giorgetti; Sophia Randolph; Maria Koehler; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

5.  Phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of maintenance chemotherapy versus observation in patients with metastatic breast cancer after achieving disease control with six cycles of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy: KCSG-BR07-02.

Authors:  Yeon Hee Park; Kyung Hae Jung; Seock-Ah Im; Joo Hyuk Sohn; Jungsil Ro; Jin-Hee Ahn; Sung-Bae Kim; Byung-Ho Nam; Do Youn Oh; Sae-Won Han; Soohyeon Lee; In Hae Park; Keun Seok Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Seok Yun Kang; Moon Hee Lee; Hee Sook Park; Jin Seok Ahn; Young-Hyuck Im
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  National consensus in China on diagnosis and treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Binghe Xu; Xichun Hu; Zefei Jiang; Huiping Li; Jiayi Chen; Shude Cui; Qing Li; Ning Liao; Donggeng Liu; Jian Liu; Jinsong Lu; Kunwei Shen; Tao Sun; Yuee Teng; Zhongsheng Tong; Shulian Wang; Xiang Wang; Xiaojia Wang; Yongsheng Wang; Jiong Wu; Peng Yuan; Pin Zhang; Qingyuan Zhang; Hong Zheng; Da Pang; Guosheng Ren; Zhimin Shao; Zhenzhou Shen; Erwei Song; Santai Song
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-10

7.  Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Richard S Finn; Miguel Martin; Hope S Rugo; Stephen Jones; Seock-Ah Im; Karen Gelmon; Nadia Harbeck; Oleg N Lipatov; Janice M Walshe; Stacy Moulder; Eric Gauthier; Dongrui R Lu; Sophia Randolph; Véronique Diéras; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3).

Authors:  F Cardoso; A Costa; E Senkus; M Aapro; F André; C H Barrios; J Bergh; G Bhattacharyya; L Biganzoli; M J Cardoso; L Carey; D Corneliussen-James; G Curigliano; V Dieras; N El Saghir; A Eniu; L Fallowfield; D Fenech; P Francis; K Gelmon; A Gennari; N Harbeck; C Hudis; B Kaufman; I Krop; M Mayer; H Meijer; S Mertz; S Ohno; O Pagani; E Papadopoulos; F Peccatori; F Penault-Llorca; M J Piccart; J Y Pierga; H Rugo; L Shockney; G Sledge; S Swain; C Thomssen; A Tutt; D Vorobiof; B Xu; L Norton; E Winer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Maintenance hormonal treatment improves progression free survival after a first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Armelle Dufresne; Xavier Pivot; Christophe Tournigand; Thomas Facchini; Thierry Alweeg; Loic Chaigneau; Aimery De Gramont
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Hormonal therapy might be a better choice as maintenance treatment than capecitabine after response to first-line capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Chen; Feng Du; Ruo-Xi Hong; Jia-Yu Wang; Yang Luo; Qing Li; Ying Fan; Bing-He Xu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.