Literature DB >> 10471727

The effects of deleterious mutations on linked, neutral variation in small populations.

S Pálsson1, P Pamilo.   

Abstract

The effects of recessive, deleterious mutations on genetic variation at linked neutral loci can be heterozygosity-decreasing because of reduced effective population sizes or heterozygosity-increasing because of associative overdominance. Here we examine the balance between these effects by simulating individual diploid genotypes in small panmictic populations. The haploid genome consists of one linkage group with 1000 loci that can have deleterious mutations and a neutral marker. Combinations of the following parameters are studied: gametic mutation rate to harmful alleles (U), population size (N), recombination rate (r), selection coefficient (s), and dominance (h). Tight linkage (r </= 10(-4)) gives significant associative effects, leading either to strong reduction of heterozygosity when the product Nhs is large or to a clear increase when the product Nhs is small, the boundary between these effects being 1 < Nhs < 4 in our simulations. Associative overdominance can lead to heterozygosities that are larger than predicted by the background selection models and even larger than the neutral expectation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10471727      PMCID: PMC1460752     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  12 in total

1.  Associative overdominance, heterozygosity and fitness.

Authors:  P Pamilo; S Pálsson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai; S I Chigusa; L E Mettler; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Heterosis at the level of the chromosome and at the level of the gene.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Is the gene the unit of selection?

Authors:  I Franklin; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D A Kirby; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Linkage and the limits to natural selection.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  An improved method for estimating the rate of fixation of favorable mutations based on DNA polymorphism data.

Authors:  W Stephan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Deleterious background selection with recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  10 in total

1.  An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck.

Authors:  N Bierne; A Tsitrone; P David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A temporal analysis shows major histocompatibility complex loci in the Scandinavian wolf population are consistent with neutral evolution.

Authors:  J M Seddon; H Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fitting background-selection predictions to levels of nucleotide variation and divergence along the human autosomes.

Authors:  Floyd A Reed; Joshua M Akey; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The evolution of recombination in self-fertilizing organisms.

Authors:  Roman Stetsenko; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Resolving the Conflict Between Associative Overdominance and Background Selection.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The genetic basis and experimental evolution of inbreeding depression in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  I M Chelo; S Carvalho; M Roque; S R Proulx; H Teotónio
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  The effects of weak selection on neutral diversity at linked sites.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Dispersing away from bad genotypes: the evolution of Fitness-Associated Dispersal (FAD) in homogeneous environments.

Authors:  Ariel Gueijman; Amir Ayali; Yoav Ram; Lilach Hadany
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  On the Consequences of Purging and Linkage on Fitness and Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Diego Bersabé; Armando Caballero; Andrés Pérez-Figueroa; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.154

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.