Literature DB >> 10471574

Fluoroquinolone resistance in Bacteroides fragilis following sparfloxacin exposure.

M L Peterson1, L B Hovde, D H Wright, A D Hoang, J K Raddatz, P J Boysen, J C Rotschafer.   

Abstract

In vitro pharmacodynamic studies investigating the antimicrobial properties of five fluoroquinolones, (trovafloxacin, sparfloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin) against Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 23745 were conducted. The times required to reduce the viable counts by 3 log units were as follows: clinafloxacin, 2.9 h; levofloxacin, 4.6 h; trovafloxacin, 6 h; and sparfloxacin, 10 h. Exposure to ciprofloxacin did not achieve a 3-log decrease in viable counts. The susceptibility of B. fragilis was determined both prior to exposure and following 24 h of exposure to each of the five fluoroquinolones tested. The MICs of clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, and clindamycin were determined by the broth microdilution method. The MICs for B. fragilis preexposure were as follows: clinafloxacin, 0.25 microg/ml; trovafloxacin, 0.5 microg/ml; sparfloxacin, 2 microg /ml; levofloxacin, 2 microg/ml; and ciprofloxacin, 8 microg/ml. Similar pre- and postexposure MICs were obtained for cultures exposed to trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. However, following 24 h of exposure to sparfloxacin, a fluoroquinolone-resistant strain emerged. The MICs for this strain were as follows: clinafloxacin, 1 microg/ml; trovafloxacin, 4 microg/ml; sparfloxacin, 16 microg/ml; levofloxacin, 16 microg/ml; and ciprofloxacin, 32 microg/ml. No changes in the susceptibility of B. fragilis pre- and postexposure to sparfloxacin were noted for metronidazole (MIC, 1 microg/ml), cefoxitin (MIC, 4 microg /ml), chloramphenicol (MIC, 4 microg/ml), and clindamycin (MIC, 0.06 microg/ml). Resistance remained stable as the organism was passaged on antibiotic-free agar for 10 consecutive days. Mutant B. fragilis strains with decreased susceptibility to clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were selected on brucella blood agar containing 8x the MIC of levofloxacin at a frequencies of 6.4 x 10(-9), 4x the MICs of trovafloxacin and sparfloxacin at frequencies of 2.2 x 10(-9) and 3. 3 x 10(-10), respectively, and 2x the MIC of clinafloxacin at a frequency of 5.5 x 10(-11); no mutants were selected with ciprofloxacin. The susceptibilities of strains to trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, clinafloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ciprofloxacin before and after exposure to sparfloxacin were modestly affected by the presence of reserpine (20 microg/ml), an inhibitor of antibiotic efflux. The mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance is being explored, but it is unlikely to be efflux due to a lack of cross-resistance to unrelated antimicrobial agents and to the fact that the MICs for strains before and after exposure to sparfloxacin are minimally affected by reserpine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10471574      PMCID: PMC89456     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  24 in total

1.  Efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Bacillus subtilis: similarities and dissimilarities with the mammalian system.

Authors:  A A Neyfakh; V E Bidnenko; L B Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mutants of the Bacillus subtilis multidrug transporter Bmr with altered sensitivity to the antihypertensive alkaloid reserpine.

Authors:  M Ahmed; C M Borsch; A A Neyfakh; S Schuldiner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Increased activity of a new chlorofluoroquinolone, BAY y 3118, compared with activities of ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  K E Aldridge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Mechanisms of action of and resistance to ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  D C Hooper; J S Wolfson; E Y Ng; M N Swartz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-04-27       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Elimination of quinolone antibiotic carryover through use of antibiotic-removal beads.

Authors:  R A Zabinski; A J Larsson; K J Walker; S S Gilliland; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Patterns of susceptibility to fluoroquinolones among anaerobic bacterial isolates in the United States.

Authors:  E J Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Wound and intraabdominal infections: microbiological considerations and approaches to treatment.

Authors:  R L Nichols; J W Smith
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Comparative activities of eight quinolones against members of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  M V Borobio; M Conejo; E Ramirez; A I Suarez; E J Perea
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparative activity of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, CI-960, CI-990, and WIN 57273 against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Evaluation of activity of temafloxacin against Bacteroides fragilis by an in vitro pharmacodynamic system.

Authors:  R A Zabinski; K Vance-Bryan; A J Krinke; K J Walker; J A Moody; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  5 in total

1.  Role of topoisomerase mutations and efflux in fluoroquinolone resistance of Bacteroides fragilis clinical isolates and laboratory mutants.

Authors:  Vito Ricci; Marnie L Peterson; John C Rotschafer; Hannah Wexler; Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin and levofloxacin against Bacteroides fragilis in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  M L Peterson; L B Hovde; D H Wright; G H Brown; A D Hoang; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Fluoroquinolone resistance in anaerobic bacteria following exposure to levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, and sparfloxacin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  G H Ross; D H Wright; L B Hovde; M L Peterson; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of the mutant selection window hypothesis using four fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Alexander A Firsov; Sergey N Vostrov; Irene Y Lubenko; Karl Drlica; Yury A Portnoy; Stephen H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacodynamics of pulse dosing versus standard dosing: in vitro metronidazole activity against Bacteroides fragilis and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron.

Authors:  Khalid H Ibrahim; Brent W Gunderson; Elizabeth D Hermsen; Laurie B Hovde; John C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.