Literature DB >> 10471285

Sequence and functional-group specificity for cleavage of DNA junctions by RuvC of Escherichia coli.

J M Fogg1, M J Schofield, M F White, D M Lilley.   

Abstract

RuvC is the DNA junction-resolving enzyme of Escherichia coli. While the enzyme binds to DNA junctions independently of base sequence, it exhibits considerable sequence selectivity for the phosphodiester cleavage reaction. We have analyzed the sequence specificity using a panel of DNA junctions, measuring the rate of cleavage of each under single-turnover conditions. We have found that the optimal sequence for cleavage can be described by (A approximately T)TT downward arrow(C>G approximately A), where downward arrow denotes the position of backbone scission. Cleavage is fastest when the cleaved phosphodiester linkage is located at the point of strand exchange. However, cleavage is possible one nucleotide 3' of this position when directed by the sequence, with a rate that is 1 order of magnitude slower than the optimal. The maximum sequence discrimination occurs at the central TT in the tetranucleotide site, where any alteration of sequence results in a rate reduction of at least 100-fold and cleavage is undetectable for some changes. However, certain sequences in the outer nucleotides are strongly inhibitory to cleavage. Introduction of base analogues around the cleavage site reveals a number of important functional groups and suggests that major-groove contacts in the center of the tetranucleotide are important for the cleavage process. Since RuvC binds to all the variant junctions with very similar affinity, any contacts affecting the rate of cleavage must be primarily important in the transition state. Introduction of the optimal cleavage sequence into a three-way DNA junction led to relatively efficient cleavage by RuvC, at a rate only 3-fold slower than the optimal four-way junction. This is consistent with a protein-induced alteration in the conformation of the DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10471285     DOI: 10.1021/bi990926n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  10 in total

1.  Single Holliday junctions are intermediates of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Gareth A Cromie; Randy W Hyppa; Andrew F Taylor; Kseniya Zakharyevich; Neil Hunter; Gerald R Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Guidelines for DNA recombination and repair studies: Cellular assays of DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  Hannah L Klein; Giedrė Bačinskaja; Jun Che; Anais Cheblal; Rajula Elango; Anastasiya Epshtein; Devon M Fitzgerald; Belén Gómez-González; Sharik R Khan; Sandeep Kumar; Bryan A Leland; Léa Marie; Qian Mei; Judith Miné-Hattab; Alicja Piotrowska; Erica J Polleys; Christopher D Putnam; Elina A Radchenko; Anissia Ait Saada; Cynthia J Sakofsky; Eun Yong Shim; Mathew Stracy; Jun Xia; Zhenxin Yan; Yi Yin; Andrés Aguilera; Juan Lucas Argueso; Catherine H Freudenreich; Susan M Gasser; Dmitry A Gordenin; James E Haber; Grzegorz Ira; Sue Jinks-Robertson; Megan C King; Richard D Kolodner; Andrei Kuzminov; Sarah Ae Lambert; Sang Eun Lee; Kyle M Miller; Sergei M Mirkin; Thomas D Petes; Susan M Rosenberg; Rodney Rothstein; Lorraine S Symington; Pawel Zawadzki; Nayun Kim; Michael Lisby; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2019-01-07

3.  Structure and Metal Binding Properties of a Poxvirus Resolvase.

Authors:  Huiguang Li; Young Hwang; Kay Perry; Frederic Bushman; Gregory D Van Duyne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Mus81 cleavage of Holliday junctions: a failsafe for processing meiotic recombination intermediates?

Authors:  Louise J Gaskell; Fekret Osman; Robert J C Gilbert; Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Holliday junction resolvases.

Authors:  Haley D M Wyatt; Stephen C West
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Holliday junction trap shows how cells use recombination and a junction-guardian role of RecQ helicase.

Authors:  Jun Xia; Li-Tzu Chen; Qian Mei; Chien-Hui Ma; Jennifer A Halliday; Hsin-Yu Lin; David Magnan; John P Pribis; Devon M Fitzgerald; Holly M Hamilton; Megan Richters; Ralf B Nehring; Xi Shen; Lei Li; David Bates; P J Hastings; Christophe Herman; Makkuni Jayaram; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Single bacterial resolvases first exploit, then constrain intrinsic dynamics of the Holliday junction to direct recombination.

Authors:  Sujay Ray; Nibedita Pal; Nils G Walter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Crystal structure of RuvC resolvase in complex with Holliday junction substrate.

Authors:  Karolina M Górecka; Weronika Komorowska; Marcin Nowotny
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  GEN1 from a thermophilic fungus is functionally closely similar to non-eukaryotic junction-resolving enzymes.

Authors:  Alasdair D J Freeman; Yijin Liu; Anne-Cécile Déclais; Anton Gartner; David M J Lilley
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Junction resolving enzymes use multivalency to keep the Holliday junction dynamic.

Authors:  Ruobo Zhou; Olivia Yang; Anne-Cécile Déclais; Hyeonseok Jin; Gwang Hyeon Gwon; Alasdair D J Freeman; Yunje Cho; David M J Lilley; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 15.040

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.