BACKGROUND: The clamping method of alcohol administration was combined with a battery of dependent measures of frontal lobe brain function, and a novel index of acute adaptation, in a preliminary study in order to explore the paradigm's sensitivity to a familial history of alcoholism (FHA). METHODS: Ten family history-positive (FHP) and 10 family history-negative (FHN) adult social drinkers of both genders underwent alcohol clamping. Twenty minutes after the start of an intravenous infusion of alcohol, the breath alcohol concentration was clamped at a target of 60+/-5 mg/dl for 150 min. Initial and adaptive responses to alcohol were assessed using scalar indices of change. One index assessed initial improvements or impairments in brain function after alcohol. The other index assessed acute adaptation (tolerance or sensitization) to alcohol while the brain's exposure to alcohol was held constant. The battery of dependent measures included subjective perceptions, neuropsychological tests, saccadic eye-movement tasks, and event-related potential (ERP) tasks. Effect sizes for FHA were estimated for 10 dependent variables that showed adequate baseline test-retest reliability (r>0.6). RESULTS: FHP subjects showed less intense initial responses to alcohol in subjective perceptions, but greater changes in the latency of volitional saccades and ERP P3 components than did the FHN controls. FHP subjects generally showed greater acute tolerance to alcohol than did controls, who showed more instances of acute sensitization at this moderate breath alcohol concentration. Effect sizes for FHA exceeded 0.4 in more than half of the indices. CONCLUSIONS: The BrAC clamping paradigm assesses initial and adaptive responses of a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures of frontal lobe function to ethanol that appear both reliable and sensitive to FHA.
BACKGROUND: The clamping method of alcohol administration was combined with a battery of dependent measures of frontal lobe brain function, and a novel index of acute adaptation, in a preliminary study in order to explore the paradigm's sensitivity to a familial history of alcoholism (FHA). METHODS: Ten family history-positive (FHP) and 10 family history-negative (FHN) adult social drinkers of both genders underwent alcohol clamping. Twenty minutes after the start of an intravenous infusion of alcohol, the breath alcohol concentration was clamped at a target of 60+/-5 mg/dl for 150 min. Initial and adaptive responses to alcohol were assessed using scalar indices of change. One index assessed initial improvements or impairments in brain function after alcohol. The other index assessed acute adaptation (tolerance or sensitization) to alcohol while the brain's exposure to alcohol was held constant. The battery of dependent measures included subjective perceptions, neuropsychological tests, saccadic eye-movement tasks, and event-related potential (ERP) tasks. Effect sizes for FHA were estimated for 10 dependent variables that showed adequate baseline test-retest reliability (r>0.6). RESULTS: FHP subjects showed less intense initial responses to alcohol in subjective perceptions, but greater changes in the latency of volitional saccades and ERP P3 components than did the FHN controls. FHP subjects generally showed greater acute tolerance to alcohol than did controls, who showed more instances of acute sensitization at this moderate breath alcohol concentration. Effect sizes for FHA exceeded 0.4 in more than half of the indices. CONCLUSIONS: The BrAC clamping paradigm assesses initial and adaptive responses of a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures of frontal lobe function to ethanol that appear both reliable and sensitive to FHA.
Authors: Remco W M Zoethout; Rik C Schoemaker; Lineke Zuurman; Hans van Pelt; Albert Dahan; Adam F Cohen; Joop M A van Gerven Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Gabriela Gan; Alvaro Guevara; Michael Marxen; Maike Neumann; Elisabeth Jünger; Andrea Kobiella; Eva Mennigen; Maximilian Pilhatsch; Daniel Schwarz; Ulrich S Zimmermann; Michael N Smolka Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Nicole M Strang; Eric D Claus; Vijay A Ramchandani; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Isabelle Boileau; Christian S Hendershot Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Erin E Shannon; Elizabeth R Staniforth; Juliette McNamara; Kimberly A Bernosky-Smith; Anthony Liguori Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2010-12-02 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Douglas S Ramsay; Brian G Leroux; Marilynn Rothen; Christopher W Prall; Louis O Fiset; Stephen C Woods Journal: Pain Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Rosane Gomez; Kevin L Behar; June Watzl; Stuart A Weinzimer; Barbara Gulanski; Gerard Sanacora; Julia Koretski; Elizabeth Guidone; Lihong Jiang; Ismene L Petrakis; Brian Pittman; John H Krystal; Graeme F Mason Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-08-19 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Robert F Leeman; Elizabeth Ralevski; Diana Limoncelli; Brian Pittman; Stephanie S O'Malley; Ismene L Petrakis Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 4.530