Literature DB >> 10470844

Standard combination versus alternating chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a randomised clinical trial including 394 patients. 'Petites Cellules' Group.

T Urban1, T Baleyte, C L Chastang, L Jeannin, P Delaval, M Zaegel, M Mornet, D Coetmeur, B Lebeau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: to compare standard and alternating administration of chemotherapy combinations in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: in a multicenter clinical trial, 394 previously untreated SCLC patients were randomised to receive, every 4 weeks, eight courses of either a standard regimen with CCNU, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin (CCA) and VP16 or an alternating regimen (CCA regimen alternating with cisplatin-vindesine-VP16).
RESULTS: overall response rate was higher in the standard group (78%) than in the alternating group (64%) (P = 0.0001). Complete response rate was also higher in the standard group (32%) than in the alternating group (18%) (P = 0.004). The median survival in the overall SCLC population was 306 days in the standard group and 272 days in the alternating group (P = 0.08). In limited SCLC patients, median survival was higher in the standard group (421 days) than in the alternating group (328 days) (P = 0.01). Grade III/IV haematological toxicity was lower in patients in the alternating group (25 versus 47%) (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: the standard regimen was better than the alternating regimen for patients with limited forms of SCLC. The alternating regimen, associated with better haematological safety and ensuring a fairly similar survival, may be considered in patients with extensive SCLC. Pleiomorphic resistance mechanisms to chemotherapy make it difficult to define a non-cross-resistant chemotherapy regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10470844     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(99)00050-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a review by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society).

Authors:  N Rodriguez de Dios; P Calvo; M Rico; M Martín; F Couñago; A Sotoca; B Taboada; A Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Isuru U Amarasena; Saion Chatterjee; Julia A E Walters; Richard Wood-Baker; Kwun M Fong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-02

3.  Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent.

Authors:  J L Pujol; L Carestia; J P Daurès
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Current and future strategies in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  N Rodríguez de Dios; M Murcia-Mejía
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2020-09-03

5.  Treatment-related death in patients with small-cell lung cancer in phase III trials over the last two decades.

Authors:  Nobuaki Ochi; Katsuyuki Hotta; Nagio Takigawa; Isao Oze; Yoshiro Fujiwara; Eiki Ichihara; Akiko Hisamoto; Masahiro Tabata; Mitsune Tanimoto; Katsuyuki Kiura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.