D A Lang1, G Neil-Dwyer, J Garfield. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Wessex Neurological Centre, Southampton University Hospitals, United Kingdom. DALang@compuserve.com
Abstract
OBJECT: The goals of this study were twofold: 1) to determine outcome, including quality of life, in patients who have undergone surgery for petroclival meningioma in which a standard skull base approach was used; and 2) to assess the impact of the patients' surgical treatment on their caregivers. METHODS: Seventeen patients (13 women and four men ranging in age from 29 to 63 years) who underwent a transpetrosal approach for a petroclival meningioma during a 5-year period were prospectively included in this study. Pre- and postoperative data including adverse events were noted. The patients were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter, and they completed a postoperative SF-36 questionnaire. In addition, each patient's caregiver was interviewed to determine the effect of the patient's illness on the caregiver's life and responsibilities. Twenty-two operations were performed. A new permanent neurological deficit developed in five patients and in eight a temporary deficit or exacerbation of existing deficits occurred. Two patients underwent surgery to create a facial-hypoglossal nerve communication; five required a temporary percutaneous gastrostomy and/or tracheostomy; three required a shunt; and one underwent successful squint surgery. At 1 year postoperatively 13 patients had made a good or moderate recovery, three were severely disabled, and one had died--outcomes in keeping with other studies. By contrast, responses to the SF-36 questionnaire showed that, in all eight of its categories, between 43% and 75% of surviving patients were functioning below accepted norms. Fifty-six percent of caregivers experienced a major change in lifestyle and 38% experienced a major change with respect to their work. CONCLUSIONS: After transpetrosal excision of a petroclival meningioma, the quality of life for the patient is worse than that indicated in surgeons' reported results. The impact on the patient's caregiver is profound-a burden perhaps not fully appreciated by the surgeon.
OBJECT: The goals of this study were twofold: 1) to determine outcome, including quality of life, in patients who have undergone surgery for petroclival meningioma in which a standard skull base approach was used; and 2) to assess the impact of the patients' surgical treatment on their caregivers. METHODS: Seventeen patients (13 women and four men ranging in age from 29 to 63 years) who underwent a transpetrosal approach for a petroclival meningioma during a 5-year period were prospectively included in this study. Pre- and postoperative data including adverse events were noted. The patients were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter, and they completed a postoperative SF-36 questionnaire. In addition, each patient's caregiver was interviewed to determine the effect of the patient's illness on the caregiver's life and responsibilities. Twenty-two operations were performed. A new permanent neurological deficit developed in five patients and in eight a temporary deficit or exacerbation of existing deficits occurred. Two patients underwent surgery to create a facial-hypoglossal nerve communication; five required a temporary percutaneous gastrostomy and/or tracheostomy; three required a shunt; and one underwent successful squint surgery. At 1 year postoperatively 13 patients had made a good or moderate recovery, three were severely disabled, and one had died--outcomes in keeping with other studies. By contrast, responses to the SF-36 questionnaire showed that, in all eight of its categories, between 43% and 75% of surviving patients were functioning below accepted norms. Fifty-six percent of caregivers experienced a major change in lifestyle and 38% experienced a major change with respect to their work. CONCLUSIONS: After transpetrosal excision of a petroclival meningioma, the quality of life for the patient is worse than that indicated in surgeons' reported results. The impact on the patient's caregiver is profound-a burden perhaps not fully appreciated by the surgeon.
Authors: K Baumstarck; T Leroy; Z Hamidou; E Tabouret; P Farina; M Barrié; C Campello; G Petrirena; O Chinot; P Auquier Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Janneke Schuuring; Mark Rijpkema; Hans Bernsen; Pieter Bernsen; Richard van der Maazen; Johannes Kaanders; Albert van der Kogel; Arend Heerschap Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Ricardo Landini Lutaif Dolci; Lígia Tédde de Moraes; Ana Carolina Mayor de Carvalho; Jeniffer Cristina Kozechen Rickli; Jamile Lopes de Souza; Williams Escalante Encinas; José Viana Lima Junior; Nilza Maria Scalissi; Américo Rubens Leite Dos Santos; Paulo Roberto Lazarini Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 2.503