Literature DB >> 10469718

Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth.

S Vilska1, A Tiitinen, C Hydén-Granskog, O Hovatta.   

Abstract

To avoid multiple pregnancies without compromising pregnancy rates (PR) is a challenge in assisted reproduction. We have compared pregnancy results among 74 elective one-embryo transfers (group 2) and 94 transfers where only one embryo was available (group 1). All the fresh embryo cycles during 1997 in two clinics in Helsinki were analysed, and cumulative PR among these couples after frozen-thawed embryo transfers up to June 1998 were counted. In group 2, where at least two embryos were available for transfer, and only one was transferred on day 2 or 3, the PR per embryo transfer was 29.7%. In group 1, the PR per embryo transfer was 20.2%. In group 2, the cumulative PR after frozen-thawed embryo transfers was 47.3% per oocyte retrieval. Over the same time, 742 two-embryo transfers were carried out. The PR per embryo transfer was 29.4% in these subjects, but 23.9% of these pregnancies were twins. The implantation rates, as well as the PR, were highest when the embryos were at the four- to five-cell stage on day 2 (35.8 versus 9.7% compared with the two- to three-cell stage, P < 0.001) or at the six- to eight-cell stage on day 3 (45.5%). The PR per embryo transfer was higher when a grade 1 or 2 embryo was transferred compared with a grade three embryo (34. 0 and 26.7% versus 8.8% respectively, P < 0.05). In women 35 years or younger, the PR per elective one-embryo transfer was 32.8%. The corresponding figure in women older than 35 years was 18.8%. On the basis of these results, elective one-embryo transfer can be highly recommended, at least in subjects who are younger than 35 years of age, and who have grade one or grade two embryos available for transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10469718     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  33 in total

1.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and other aspects of new reproductive technologies.

Authors:  A G Sutcliffe
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  A prospective randomized multicenter study to evaluate the best day for embryo transfer: does the outcome justify prolonged embryo culture?

Authors:  Markus Margreiter; Andrea Weghofer; Avi Kogosowski; Kamal Zak Mahmoud; Wilfried Feichtinger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Contribution of cryopreservation in a mandatory SET policy: analysis of 5 years of application of law in an academic IVF center.

Authors:  Yaacoub Salame; Fabienne Devreker; Romain Imbert; Anne Delbaere; Nicolas Fontenelle; Yvon Englert
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Selection of embryos for day-3 transfer at the pronuclear-stage and pronuclear-stage cryopreservation results in high delivery rates in fresh and frozen cycles.

Authors:  Diane G Hammitt; Christopher A Sattler; Misty L Manes; Anita P Singh
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Economic evaluation of infertility treatment for tubal disease.

Authors:  M Granberg; A Strandell; J Thorburn; S Daya; M Wikland
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Relationship between meiotic spindle characteristics in human oocytes and the timing of the first zygotic cleavage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tomari; Kou Honjou; Yumi Nagata; Toshitaka Horiuchi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  "One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.

Authors:  Pamela M White
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET.

Authors:  Sang Min Kang; Sang Won Lee; Hak Jun Jeong; San Hyun Yoon; Min Whan Koh; Jin Ho Lim; Seong Goo Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Factors predicting double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology: implications for elective single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Caitlin Martin; Jeani Chang; Sheree Boulet; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry Kissin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Mistaken advocacy against twin pregnancies following IVF.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Bard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.