Literature DB >> 10469680

Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos.

S Munné1, C Magli, J Cohen, P Morton, S Sadowy, L Gianaroli, M Tucker, C Márquez, D Sable, A P Ferraretti, J B Massey, R Scott.   

Abstract

usromosomal abnormalities are responsible for a great deal of embryo wastage, which is reflected, at least partially, in decreased implantation and increased miscarriage in older women. To address this problem the transfer of only chromosomally normal embryos previously selected by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been proposed. We designed a multi-centre in-vitro fertilization (IVF) study to compare controls and a test group that underwent embryo biopsy and PGD for aneuploidy. Patients were matched retrospectively, but blindly, for average maternal age, number of previous IVF cycles, duration of stimulation, oestradiol concentrations on day +1, and average mature follicles. All these parameters were similar in test and control groups. Only embryos classified as normal for those chromosomes were transferred after PGD. The results showed that the rates of fetal heart beat (FHB)/embryo transferred between the control and test groups were similar. However, spontaneous abortions, measured as FHB aborted/FHB detected, decreased after PGD (P < 0.05), and ongoing pregnancies and delivered babies increased (P < 0.05) in the PGD group of patients. Two conclusions were obtained: (i) PGD of aneuploidy reduced embryo loss after implantation; (ii) implantation rates were not significantly improved, but the proportion of ongoing and delivered babies was increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10469680     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  23 in total

1.  Multilocus genetic analysis of single interphase cells by spectral imaging.

Authors:  J Fung; H U Weier; J D Goldberg; R A Pedersen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Tenth anniversary of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Preimplantation diagnosis after assisted reproduction techniques for genetically-determined male infertility.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; A P Ferraretti; E Iammarrone
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 4.  The cytogenetics of preimplantation human development: insights provided by traditional and novel techniques.

Authors:  Helen G Tempest; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective.

Authors:  C B Coulam; R S Jeyendran; M Fiddler; E Pergament
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  Wendy Y Zhang; Frauke von Versen-Höynck; Kristopher I Kapphahn; Raquel R Fleischmann; Qianying Zhao; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Authors:  P Devroey; B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency by simultaneous analysis of duplex-nested PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a case report.

Authors:  Hyoung-Song Lee; Jin Hyun Jun; Hye Won Choi; Chun Kyu Lim; Han-Wook Yoo; Mi Kyoung Koong; Inn Soo Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; John Collins; Luca Gianaroli; Veerle Goossens; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Markus Montag; Sjoerd Repping; Andreas Schmutzler
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.