Literature DB >> 10468729

Prediction of prostatic cancer progression after radical prostatectomy using artificial neural networks: a feasibility study.

T Mattfeldt1, H A Kestler, R Hautmann, H W Gottfried.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a methodological feasibility study in a small series of patients with node-negative organ-confined prostatic cancer, using artificial neural networks to predict tumour progression after radical prostatectomy and thus help to identify high-risk patients who would benefit from adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 20 patients with pT2N0 prostatic cancer and postoperative tumour progression was compared with a control group of 20 patients with no progression, matched for age, duration of follow-up and preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level. Histopathological data were obtained from the radical prostatectomy specimens, i.e. the Gleason score, World Health Organisation (WHO) grade and maximum diameter of the tumour transects. The volume and surface area of the epithelial tumour component and of the lumina of the neoplastic glands per unit tissue volume were estimated by morphometric methods. To predict recurrence, multilayer feedforward networks with backpropagation (MLFF-BP), two implementations of learning vector quantization (LVQ), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were applied. The ability of these models to correctly classify new cases was tested using the 'leave-one-out' technique.
RESULTS: Progression was predicted correctly in 85% of newly presented cases from the three routine histopathological variables alone. On the basis of the four morphometric variables alone progression was predicted correctly in 93% of cases. The use of all seven variables as input data only slightly improved the quality of prediction. The best results were obtained by the LVQ networks and LDA, followed by MLFF-BP networks.
CONCLUSIONS: In this methodological feasibility study, the progression of pT2N0 prostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy could be predicted with good accuracy, sensitivity and specificity from routine variables or morphometric texture variables using artificial neural networks. These results suggest that this approach should be assessed in a prospective study with more cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10468729     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00209.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

1.  Artificial neural networks for decision-making in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Theodore Anagnostou; Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Artificial neural networks and prostate cancer--tools for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Xinhai Hu; Henning Cammann; Hellmuth-A Meyer; Kurt Miller; Klaus Jung; Carsten Stephan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prediction of the axillary lymph node status in mammary cancer on the basis of clinicopathological data and flow cytometry.

Authors:  T Mattfeldt; H A Kestler; H P Sinn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11

5.  Prediction of biochemical failure in localized carcinoma of prostate after radical prostatectomy by neuro-fuzzy.

Authors:  Neeraj Kumar Goyal; Abhay Kumar; Rajiba L Acharya; Udai Shankar Dwivedi; Sameer Trivedi; Pratap Bahadur Singh; T N Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-01

6.  A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.

Authors:  Hesham Salem; Daniele Soria; Jonathan N Lund; Amir Awwad
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.