Literature DB >> 10468367

Hemispheric dominance and gender in the perception of an illusion.

S Rasmjou1, M Hausmann, O Güntürkün.   

Abstract

Perception of geometric illusions is a visuo-spatial process. As such processes often have been found to be predominantly the domain of the right hemisphere, this hemisphere may be expected to perceive such illusions more readilly than the left hemisphere. Using the herringbone illusion in a reaction-test paradigm, we found that in right-handed males the right hemisphere was significantly more often deceived than the left, whereas no significant hemispheric difference was observed in females. This is the first demonstration of gender differences in the lateralized perception of an illusion.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10468367     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00154-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  7 in total

1.  The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Glenn R Wylie; Beth A Higgins; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

3.  Cortical responses to the mirror box illusion: a high-resolution EEG study.

Authors:  Line Lindhardt Egsgaard; Laura Petrini; Giselle Christoffersen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Ebbinghaus illusion with small inducers appears larger on the right side.

Authors:  Ayako Saneyoshi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Local-global interference is modulated by age, sex and anterior corpus callosum size.

Authors:  Eva M Müller-Oehring; Tilman Schulte; Carla Raassi; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Left, right, left, right, eyes to the front! Müller-Lyer bias in grasping is not a function of hand used, hand preferred or visual hemifield, but foveation does matter.

Authors:  John van der Kamp; Matthieu M de Wit; Rich S W Masters
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Valentina Brignone; Silvia Matarazzo; Marzia Del Zotto; Alberto Zani
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 3.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.