Literature DB >> 10467069

Minimally invasive evaluation of coronary stents with electron beam computed tomography: In vivo and in vitro experience.

S Möhlenkamp1, H Pump, D Baumgart, M Haude, D H Grönemeyer, R M Seibel, R S Schwartz, R Erbel.   

Abstract

We sought to describe the value of electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) to detect stent restenoses at follow-up and to identify characteristic EBCT features of coronary stents. Six coronary stents (GRII, Jostent, NIR, PS, Micro, Wiktor) were scanned in vitro (10 1. 5-mm-thick slices, 15-cm FoV, 100-ms AT) before and after inflation with 3.0-, 3.5-, and 4.0-mm balloons to study intensity values and different stent dimensions in comparison to caliper measurements. In 44 patients (60 +/- 10 years, 4 females) we prospectively compared EBCT findings [eight 8-mm-thick slices in the flow mode, 26-cm field of view (FoV), 50 ms acquisition time (AT)] with 6-month angiographic outcome after placement of 86 stents in 49 vessels. For the detection of significant angiographic luminal narrowing (>/=75%) that occurred in 17/49 vessels (35%), we found a sensitivity of 65%, a specificity of 84%, and a positive and negative predictive value of 69% and 82%, respectively. The in vitro data show significant differences in image intensity between the stents and a significant gradual decrease in image intensity with increasing stent diameters. The mean differences between EBCT and caliper measurements for the length and diameter were 0.17 +/- 0.18 mm and -0.32 +/- 0.25mm, respectively. EBCT is currently the only noninvasive technique that allows the assessment of stent dimensions and stent geometry, which may prove useful in patients when intravascular ultrasound cannot be performed. Contrast-enhanced EBCT is a promising tool for minimally invasive stent patency evaluation at follow-up, especially in patients that are unable to exercise. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:39-47, 1999. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10467069     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(199909)48:1<39::aid-ccd8>3.0.co;2-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of coronary artery stent patency by electron-beam CT.

Authors:  Friedrich D Knollmann; Jörg Möller; Axel Gebert; Christian Bethge; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter.

Authors:  Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Stefan Schaller; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Flohr; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach; David Maintz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.

Authors:  T Schlosser; T Scheuermann; S Ulzheimer; O K Mohrs; M Kühling; P E Albrecht; T Voigtländer; J Barkhausen; A Schmermund
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.

Authors:  David Maintz; Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Thomas Flohr; Michael Rink; Torsten Sommer; Murat Ozgün; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The utility of multi-detector row spiral CT for detection of coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Jae-Youn Moon; Namsik Chung; Byoung Wook Choi; Kyu Ok Choe; Hye Sun Seo; Young-Guk Ko; Seok-Min Kang; Jong-Won Ha; Se-Joong Rim; Yangsoo Jang; Won-Heum Shim; Seung-Yun Cho
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in the assessment of coronary stents.

Authors:  F Cademartiri; A Palumbo; E Maffei; L La Grutta; G Runza; F Pugliese; M Midiri; N R A Mollet; W B Meijboom; A Menozzi; L Vignali; C Reverberi; D Ardissino; G P Krestin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 6.313

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.