Literature DB >> 10462804

A comparison of monotic and dichotic complex-tone pitch perception in listeners with hearing loss.

K H Arehart1, E M Burns.   

Abstract

The perception of fundamental pitch for two-harmonic complex tones was examined in musically experienced listeners with cochlear-based high-frequency hearing loss. Performance in a musical interval identification task was measured as a function of the average rank of the lowest harmonic for both monotic and dichotic presentation of the harmonics at 14 dB Sensation Level. Listeners with hearing loss demonstrated excellent musical interval identification at low fundamental frequencies and low harmonic numbers, but abnormally poor identification at higher fundamental frequencies and higher average ranks. The upper frequency limit of performance in the listeners with hearing loss was similar in both monotic and dichotic conditions. These results suggest that something other than frequency resolution per se limits complex-tone pitch perception in listeners with hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10462804     DOI: 10.1121/1.427111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Reconsidering evidence for the suppression model of the octave illusion.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Jason B Mattingley; Simon A Moss
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

2.  An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Harmonic segregation through mistuning can improve fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Christi Wise Miller; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Auditory-nerve responses predict pitch attributes related to musical consonance-dissonance for normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Deep neural network models reveal interplay of peripheral coding and stimulus statistics in pitch perception.

Authors:  Mark R Saddler; Ray Gonzalez; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Complex-Tone Pitch Discrimination in Listeners With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Federica Bianchi; Michal Fereczkowski; Johannes Zaar; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Identification and Discrimination of Sound Textures in Hearing-Impaired and Older Listeners.

Authors:  Oliver Scheuregger; Jens Hjortkjær; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.