Literature DB >> 10456700

Silicone venous access devices positioned with their tips high in the superior vena cava are more likely to malfunction.

J Petersen1, J H Delaney, M T Brakstad, R K Rowbotham, C M Bagley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Silicone venous access devices (VADs) are commonly used for multiple intravenous infusions and blood sampling in chronically ill patients, particularly cancer patients. These devices are susceptible to malfunctions most commonly characterized by difficulty infusing fluids or withdrawing blood. We hypothesized that the incidence of such malfunctions is primarily related to the position of the catheter tip relative to the superior vena cava/right atrial junction.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records for 141 patients in whom silicone venous access devices were used. Chest radiographs obtained following catheter insertion were reviewed by a single radiologist to rule out pneumothorax and determine the position of the catheter tip. Other potential factors included in the analysis were catheter brand, the vein into which the catheter was inserted, and the side (right or left). A malfunction was defined as resistance to flushing or infusion of a substance, complete inability to infuse a substance, resistance to blood aspiration attempts, or absence of blood return with aspiration, occurring any time during which the catheter was in place. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine which factor(s) most strongly predicted catheter malfunction.
RESULTS: Catheter tip location was the only factor that was statistically predictive of malfunctions (coefficient 0.842, P < 0.001). A significant increase in malfunctions was observed in cases where the catheter tip was located greater than 4 cm superior to the junction of the right atrium and the superior vena cava (z-test of proportions, P = 0.003). Malfunctions were minimized in those cases where the catheter tip was located in the right atrium.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that malfunctions can be minimized in silicone venous access catheters by locating the catheter tip as close to the superior vena cava/right atrial junction as possible, or slightly inside the right atrium. To ensure proper location of the catheter tip, placement should be performed under fluoroscopy, and a radiograph should be obtained immediately following placement, with the patient in the upright position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10456700     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00124-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  15 in total

1.  Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf K M Teichgräber; Stephan Kausche; Sebastian N Nagel; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Paolo Cotogni; Mauro Pittiruti
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11-04

3.  Totally implantable venous access devices - 20 years' experience of implantation in cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  T James Royle; Ruth E Davies; Mark X Gannon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Functional evaluation of conventional 'Celsite' venous ports versus 'Vortex' ports with a tangential outlet: a prospective randomised pilot study.

Authors:  G A Goossens; G Verbeeck; P Moons; W Sermeus; I De Wever; M Stas
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Risk factors for upper limb deep vein thrombosis associated with the use of central vein catheter in cancer patients.

Authors:  Melina Verso; Giancarlo Agnelli; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Walter Ageno; Mario Bazzan; Antonio Lazzaro; Francesco Paoletti; Maurizio Paciaroni; Stefano Mosca; Sergio Bertoglio
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Imaging review of procedural and periprocedural complications of central venous lines, percutaneous intrathoracic drains, and nasogastric tubes.

Authors:  Hamdan Al-Jahdali; Klaus L Irion; Carolyn Allen; Daniel Marafiga de Godoy; Ali Nawaz Khan
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2012-08-30

7.  Intrapulmonal dislocation of a totally implantable venous access device.

Authors:  Thilo Hackert; Christin Tjaden; Angelika Kraft; Bernd Sido; Hendrik Dienemann; Markus W Buchler
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 8.  Hemodialysis vascular access options in pediatrics: considerations for patients and practitioners.

Authors:  Deepa H Chand; Rudolph P Valentini; Elaine S Kamil
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  A retrospective clinical audit of 696 central venous catheterizations at a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.

Authors:  Sanjay Agrawal; Yashwant S Payal; Jagdish P Sharma
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2012-10

Review 10.  Malfunctioning central venous catheters in children: a diagnostic approach.

Authors:  Alex Barnacle; Owen J Arthurs; Derek Roebuck; Melanie P Hiorns
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.