Literature DB >> 10456057

Effect of varying the intensity and train frequency of forelimb and cerebellar mossy fiber conditioned stimuli on the latency of conditioned eye-blink responses in decerebrate ferrets.

P Svensson1, M Ivarsson, G Hesslow.   

Abstract

To study the role of the mossy fiber afferents to the cerebellum in classical eye-blink conditioning, in particular the timing of the conditioned responses, we compared the effects of varying a peripheral conditioned stimulus with the effects of corresponding variations of direct stimulation of the mossy fibers. In one set of experiments, decerebrate ferrets were trained in a Pavlovian eye-blink conditioning paradigm with electrical forelimb train stimulation as conditioned stimulus and electrical periorbital stimulation as the unconditioned stimulus. When stable conditioning had been achieved, the effect of increasing the intensity or frequency of the forelimb stimulation was tested. By increasing the intensity from 1 to 2 mA, or the train frequency from 50 to 100 Hz, an immediate decrease was induced in both the onset latency and the latency to peak of the conditioned response. If the conditioned stimulus intensity/frequency was maintained at the higher level, the response latencies gradually returned to preshift values. In a second set of experiments, the forelimb stimulation was replaced by direct train stimulation of the middle cerebellar peduncle as conditioned stimulus. Varying the frequency of the stimulus train between 50 and 100 Hz had effects that were almost identical to those obtained when using a forelimb conditioned stimulus. The functional meaning of the latency effect is discussed. It is also suggested that the results support the view that the conditioned stimulus is transmitted through the mossy fibers and that the mechanism for timing the conditioned response is situated in the cerebellum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10456057     DOI: 10.1101/lm.4.1.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  11 in total

Review 1.  Parallel fiber receptive fields: a key to understanding cerebellar operation and learning.

Authors:  Carl-Fredrik Ekerot; Henrik Jörntell
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Time course of classically conditioned Purkinje cell response is determined by initial part of conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The cerebellum and red nucleus are not required for In vitro classical conditioning of the turtle abducens nerve response.

Authors:  C W Anderson; J Keifer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Links Between Single-Trial Changes and Learning Rate in Eyelid Conditioning.

Authors:  Andrei Khilkevich; Hunter E Halverson; Jose Ernesto Canton-Josh; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Memory trace and timing mechanism localized to cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Fredrik Johansson; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Anders Rasmussen; Riccardo Zucca; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Learned modification of the nictitating membrane reflex by auditory stimuli in the barn owl.

Authors:  Avinash D S Bala; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Cerebellar structure and function in male Wistar-Kyoto hyperactive rats.

Authors:  Alexandra Thanellou; John T Green
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 8.  Are Purkinje Cell Pauses Drivers of Classically Conditioned Blink Responses?

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Young Domestic Pigs (Sus scrofa) Can Perform Pavlovian Eyeblink Conditioning.

Authors:  Henk-Jan Boele; Sangyun Joung; Joanne E Fil; Austin T Mudd; Stephen A Fleming; Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek; Ryan N Dilger
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Interaction between Purkinje cells and inhibitory interneurons may create adjustable output waveforms to generate timed cerebellar output.

Authors:  Simon Hong; Lance M Optican
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.