Literature DB >> 10455840

Rapid sequence induction: a questionnaire survey of its routine conduct and continued management during a failed intubation.

A J Thwaites1, C P Rice, I Smith.   

Abstract

Two hundred and ten obstetric anaesthetists completed a questionnaire assessing how they would perform a rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia for a Caesarean section and their continued management during a failed tracheal intubation. The survey revealed considerable variation in the timing and application of cricoid pressure, the choice and dose of drugs used and the timing of their administration. The management of a difficult intubation also varied. This variability was independent of both grade of anaesthetist and frequency of practice. There appear to be at least two distinct techniques in current practice, characterised by 'fast' or 'slow' rapid sequence induction. Rapid sequence induction is clearly not a standard technique and debate is necessary to clarify the risks and benefits of its components. In particular, the rapidity of the technique and the application of cricoid pressure may contribute to the increased incidence of difficult tracheal intubation in obstetric anaesthesia.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10455840     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00738.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  9 in total

Review 1.  Newer neuromuscular blocking agents: how do they compare with established agents?

Authors:  H J Sparr; T M Beaufort; T Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  [Certain and controversial components of "rapid sequence induction"].

Authors:  T Mencke; A Zitzmann; D A Reuter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Modified rapid sequence induction and intubation: a survey of United States current practice.

Authors:  Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Eva A Cassedy; Victoria E Forbes; Nathaniel D Mercaldo; Warren S Sandberg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  [Influence of gender on the intubation conditions with rocuronium].

Authors:  T Mencke; J-U Schreiber; H Knoll; M Werth; U Grundmann; H Rensing
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  [Induction of anaesthesia and intubation in children with a full stomach. Time to rethink!].

Authors:  M Weiss; A C Gerber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis.

Authors:  Shantini Paranjothy; James D Griffiths; Hannah K Broughton; Gillian Ml Gyte; Heather C Brown; Jane Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 7.  Routine prophylactic drugs in normal labour for reducing gastric aspiration and its effects.

Authors:  G M L Gyte; Y Richens
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

8.  Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  M C Mushambi; S M Kinsella; M Popat; H Swales; K K Ramaswamy; A L Winton; A C Quinn
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Anaesthesia protocol evaluation of the videolaryngoscopy with the McGrath MAC and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in 1000 patients undergoing rapid sequence induction: the randomised multicentre LARA trial study protocol.

Authors:  Marc Kriege; Philipp Lang; Christoph Lang; Nina Pirlich; Eva-Verena Griemert; Florian Heid; Eva Wittenmeier; Irene Schmidtmann; W Schmidbauer; Christoph Jänig; Johannes Jungbecker; Oliver Kunitz; Maximilian Strate; Axel Schmutz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.