Literature DB >> 10455372

Factors associated with attrition from a national bone marrow registry.

G E Switzer1, M A Dew, A A Stukas, J M Goycoolea, J Hegland, R G Simmons.   

Abstract

During its 10-year existence, the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) has been extremely successful at recruiting potential bone marrow donors to join the volunteer registry. Due in part to successful recruitment and the longevity of the registry, the focus of the NMDP has now shifted to decreasing potential attrition when volunteers are recontacted for additional testing to determine whether they would be the optimal donor for a specific patient. Our own interest in the bone marrow donation process led us to examine four domains of variables - demographic characteristics, volunteer history, recruitment-related characteristics and donation-related concerns - that we hypothesized would be associated with increased likelihood of donor attrition at a key donor decision-point (DR-stage blood typing). Questionnaires were mailed to potential donors after they were contacted at the DR-stage, and had made the decision of whether or not to continue with blood typing. Our final sample included 756 volunteers who decided to continue with typing, and 258 individuals who declined further participation in the registry. In the bivariate analyses, factors in three of the four domains (all except demographic characteristics) were found to be substantially correlated with likelihood of attrition. Logistic regression indicated that nine central variables across the three domains produced the majority of increased attrition likelihood. Finally, a dose-response analysis suggested that as the number of attrition-related factors endorsed by an individual increased, his/her likelihood of dropping out of the registry also increased. Implications for future research and interventions to reduce potential donor attrition are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10455372     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  11 in total

1.  Getting to the Heart of Being the Match: A Qualitative Analysis of Bone Marrow Donor Recruitment and Retention Among College Students.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Kaster; Charles R Rogers; Kwon Chan Jeon; Brittany Rosen
Journal:  Health Educ (Muncie)       Date:  2014

2.  Impact of long-term cryopreservation on single umbilical cord blood transplantation outcomes.

Authors:  Richard Mitchell; John E Wagner; Claudio G Brunstein; Qing Cao; David H McKenna; Troy C Lund; Michael R Verneris
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Giving blood and enrolling on the stem cell donor registry: ranking of obstacles and motives in Switzerland.

Authors:  Thomas Bart; Thomas Volken; Yvonne Fischer; Behrouz Mansouri Taleghani
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Ethnicity, length of time on the register and sex predict donor availability at the confirmatory typing stage.

Authors:  R N Lown; S G E Marsh; G E Switzer; K A Latham; J A Madrigal; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Health-Related Quality-of-Life Comparison of Adult Related and Unrelated HSC Donors: An RDSafe Study.

Authors:  Galen E Switzer; Jessica G Bruce; Deidre M Kiefer; Hati Kobusingye; Kaleab Z Abebe; Rebecca Drexler; RaeAnne M Besser; Dennis L Confer; Mary M Horowitz; Roberta J King; Bronwen E Shaw; Marcie Riches; Brandon Hayes-Lattin; Michael Linenberger; Brian Bolwell; Scott D Rowley; Mark R Litzow; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Rapid Mobilization Reveals a Highly Engraftable Hematopoietic Stem Cell.

Authors:  Jonathan Hoggatt; Pratibha Singh; Tiffany A Tate; Bin-Kuan Chou; Shruti R Datari; Seiji Fukuda; Liqiong Liu; Peter V Kharchenko; Amir Schajnovitz; Ninib Baryawno; Francois E Mercier; Joseph Boyer; Jason Gardner; Dwight M Morrow; David T Scadden; Louis M Pelus
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in Attitudes, Perceptions, and Knowledge about Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donation: A Study of Younger Newly Recruited Potential Donors.

Authors:  Ahmed B Hamed; Jessica G Bruce; Vidya Kuniyil; Deborah Mattila; Eric P Williams; Mary Amanda Dew; Larissa Myaskovsky; Dennis L Confer; Galen E Switzer
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2022-03-15

8.  Health-Related Quality of Life among Older Related Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors (>60 Years) Is Equivalent to That of Younger Related Donors (18 to 60 Years): A Related Donor Safety Study.

Authors:  Galen E Switzer; Jessica Bruce; Deidre M Kiefer; Hati Kobusingye; Rebecca Drexler; RaeAnne M Besser; Dennis L Confer; Mary M Horowitz; Roberta J King; Bronwen E Shaw; Marcie Riches; Brandon Hayes-Lattin; Michael Linenberger; Brian Bolwell; Scott D Rowley; Mark R Litzow; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Race and ethnicity in decisions about unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donation.

Authors:  Galen E Switzer; Jessica G Bruce; Larissa Myaskovsky; Andrea DiMartini; Diana Shellmer; Dennis L Confer; Linda K Abress; Roberta J King; Allyson G Harnaha; Sibylle Ohngemach; Mary Amanda Dew
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Bioethical Lens.

Authors:  Arcangelo Liso; Margherita Neri; Francesca Maglietta; Raffaele La Russa; Emanuela Turillazzi
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.