Literature DB >> 10454678

Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography--A Faustian bargain?

D J Rouse1, J Owen.   

Abstract

Both our previously performed decision analysis and more recent clinical data considered in the context of our decision analytic framework support the claim that in the pregnancies of women without diabetes the level of intervention and the economic costs of prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography are predicted to be excessive. Under the most plausible assumptions, a prophylactic cesarean policy with either a 4000- or 4500-g macrosomia threshold would require more than 1000 cesarean deliveries and millions of dollars to avert a single permanent brachial plexus injury. In the pregnancies of diabetic women, although such policies would be expected to perform appreciably better, their use would nevertheless entail considerable intervention for any benefit achieved. Under most assumptions, hundreds of cesarean deliveries and hundreds of thousands of dollars would be required to avert a single permanent brachial plexus injury. In light of the available data, optimizing the management of shoulder dystocia seems at present to be the most immediate and tenable approach to the prevention of birth-related brachial plexus injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10454678     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70557-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Treating mild gestational diabetes mellitus: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Mika S Ohno; Teresa N Sparks; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Risk Factors for Shoulder Dystocia: the Impact of Mother's Race and Ethnicity.

Authors:  Jennifer Gaudet Hefele; Palmira Santos; Grant Ritter; Neha Varma; Ann Hendrich
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-04-26

Review 3.  Shoulder dystocia: prediction and management.

Authors:  Meghan G Hill; Wayne R Cohen
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

4.  Shoulder dystocia: an Evidence-Based approach.

Authors:  Salvatore Politi; Laura Dʼemidio; Pietro Cignini; Maurizio Giorlandino; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2010-07

5.  A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia.

Authors:  Matthew K Hoffman; Jennifer L Bailit; D Ware Branch; Ronald T Burkman; Paul Van Veldhusien; Li Lu; Michelle A Kominiarek; Judith U Hibbard; Helain J Landy; Shoshana Haberman; Isabelle Wilkins; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Uma M Reddy; James Troendle; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  An investigation into utilising gestational body mass index as a screening tool for adverse birth outcomes and maternal morbidities in a group of pregnant women in Khayelitsha.

Authors:  Hr Davies; J Visser; M Tomlinson; Mj Rotheram-Borus; C Gissane; J Harwood; I LeRoux
Journal:  South Afr J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013

7.  Gestational diabetes screening with the new IADPSG guidelines: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John F Mission; Mika S Ohno; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Surgical Technique and Anatomical Considerations for the Modified L'Episcopo Tendon Transfer.

Authors:  David M Brogan; Fraser J Leversedge
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-10-07

Review 9.  Intrapartum interventions for preventing shoulder dystocia.

Authors:  C Athukorala; P Middleton; C A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

10.  Estimating fetal weight for best clinical outcome.

Authors:  Susan Campbell Westerway
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.