BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) results in elevated concentrations of trypsinogen (T) isoenzymes in serum. Immunoreactive anionic trypsinogen in urin (irAT/u) is elevated in AP, and has recently been proposed as a rapid diagnostic instrument and severity predictor. These results have not been confirmed by other groups, and irAT/u has not been further characterized. The concentration of immunoreactive cationic trypsinogen in urine (irCT/u) and the serum irAT/irCT ratio in AP have not been extensively examined. METHODS: Levels of irAT and irCT were studied in urine and serum from 50 AP patients and in urine from 41 non-AP patients. Severity was assessed according to the Atlanta classification. irAT/u was characterized by gel filtration. RESULTS: Gel filtration revealed only AT in the urine. Highly significant differences in irAT/u were seen between AP/non-AP (p < 0.0001) and mild/severe disease (p = 0.0012). The irAT/irCT ratio in serum changed from normal 0.8 to 1.3 in AP. CONCLUSIONS: IrAT and only traces of irCT were found in the urine in AP. IrAT/u was higher in AP than in other acute abdominal disorders (non-AP) and also higher in severe than in mild AP. IrAT in serum (irAT/s) increased proportionally more than irCT/s in AP, but did not discriminate mild from severe forms. High levels of irAT/u in some non-AP cases and a wide range in AP cases make the clinical value of the test questionable.
BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) results in elevated concentrations of trypsinogen (T) isoenzymes in serum. Immunoreactive anionic trypsinogen in urin (irAT/u) is elevated in AP, and has recently been proposed as a rapid diagnostic instrument and severity predictor. These results have not been confirmed by other groups, and irAT/u has not been further characterized. The concentration of immunoreactive cationic trypsinogen in urine (irCT/u) and the serum irAT/irCT ratio in AP have not been extensively examined. METHODS: Levels of irAT and irCT were studied in urine and serum from 50 AP patients and in urine from 41 non-AP patients. Severity was assessed according to the Atlanta classification. irAT/u was characterized by gel filtration. RESULTS: Gel filtration revealed only AT in the urine. Highly significant differences in irAT/u were seen between AP/non-AP (p < 0.0001) and mild/severe disease (p = 0.0012). The irAT/irCT ratio in serum changed from normal 0.8 to 1.3 in AP. CONCLUSIONS: IrAT and only traces of irCT were found in the urine in AP. IrAT/u was higher in AP than in other acute abdominal disorders (non-AP) and also higher in severe than in mild AP. IrAT in serum (irAT/s) increased proportionally more than irCT/s in AP, but did not discriminate mild from severe forms. High levels of irAT/u in some non-AP cases and a wide range in AP cases make the clinical value of the test questionable.
Authors: J Hedström; V Sainio; E Kemppainen; P Puolakkainen; R Haapiainen; E Kivilaakso; K O Schauman; U H Stenman Journal: Clin Chem Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: E A Kemppainen; J I Hedström; P A Puolakkainen; V S Sainio; R K Haapiainen; V Perhoniemi; S Osman; E O Kivilaakso; U H Stenman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245