Literature DB >> 10452371

Quantitative measure of genetic differences in susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in two strains of mice.

R R Davis1, M L Cheever, E F Krieg, L C Erway.   

Abstract

The CBA/CaJ (CB) and C57BL/6J (B6) inbred strains of mice were exposed for 1 h to noise intensities between 98 and 119 dB SPL. Previous studies indicated that the B6 mice exhibited permanent threshold shifts (PTS) after 1h exposure to 110 dB, whereas the CB mice did not exhibit any PTS. These differences in susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) appear to be due to a gene for age-related hearing loss (AHL). The current study was designed to determine dose-response curves for NIHL over the ranges of intensities of noise that would characterize the B6 and CB inbred strains of mice. Because of the considerable differences in sensitivity to NIHL, the noise exposures for the two strains overlapped only at 110 and 113 dB. Nevertheless, the two strains exhibited two different dose-response curves, offset and with different slopes. We postulate that the B6 strain of mice exhibits a more linear increase for PTS from 98-113 dB, consistent with incremental effects on some metabolic physiological mechanism(s); the abrupt transition in NIHL between 113 and 116 dB for the CB mice is consistent with an ototraumatic structural injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10452371     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00060-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Current aspects of hearing loss from occupational and leisure noise.

Authors:  S Plontke; H-P Zenner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-12-28

2.  Tinnitus Correlates with Downregulation of Cortical Glutamate Decarboxylase 65 Expression But Not Auditory Cortical Map Reorganization.

Authors:  Asako Miyakawa; Weihua Wang; Sung-Jin Cho; Delia Li; Sungchil Yang; Shaowen Bao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Divergence of noise vulnerability in cochleae of young CBA/J and CBA/CaJ mice.

Authors:  Kevin K Ohlemiller; Mary E Rybak Rice; Erin A Rellinger; Amanda J Ortmann
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  N-Acetyl L-Cysteine does not protect mouse ears from the effects of noise*.

Authors:  Rickie R Davis; David A Custer; Edward Krieg; Kumar Alagramam
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.646

5.  Analysis of environmental sound levels in modern rodent housing rooms.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Bradford J May; Ziwei Judy Hao; Julie Watson
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.625

6.  A major effect QTL on chromosome 18 for noise injury to the mouse cochlear lateral wall.

Authors:  Kevin K Ohlemiller; Allyson D Rosen; Patricia M Gagnon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Genome-wide screening for genetic loci associated with noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Cory H White; Jeffrey D Ohmen; Sonal Sheth; Amina F Zebboudj; Richard K McHugh; Larry F Hoffman; Aldons J Lusis; Richard C Davis; Rick A Friedman
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Fabp7 maps to a quantitative trait locus for a schizophrenia endophenotype.

Authors:  Akiko Watanabe; Tomoko Toyota; Yuji Owada; Takeshi Hayashi; Yoshimi Iwayama; Miho Matsumata; Yuichi Ishitsuka; Akihiro Nakaya; Motoko Maekawa; Tetsuo Ohnishi; Ryoichi Arai; Katsuyasu Sakurai; Kazuo Yamada; Hisatake Kondo; Kenji Hashimoto; Noriko Osumi; Takeo Yoshikawa
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.