Literature DB >> 21108998

Divergence of noise vulnerability in cochleae of young CBA/J and CBA/CaJ mice.

Kevin K Ohlemiller1, Mary E Rybak Rice, Erin A Rellinger, Amanda J Ortmann.   

Abstract

CBA/CaJ and CBA/J inbred mouse strains appear relatively resistant to age- and noise-related cochlear pathology, and constitute the predominant 'good hearing' control strains in mouse studies of hearing and deafness. These strains have often been treated as nearly equivalent in their hearing characteristics, and have even been mixed in some studies. Nevertheless, we recently showed that their trajectories with regard to age-associated cochlear pathology diverge after one year of age (Ohlemiller et al., 2010a). We also recently reported that they show quite different susceptibility to cochlear noise injury during the 'sensitive period' of heightened vulnerability to noise common to many models, CBA/J being far more vulnerable than CBA/CaJ (Fernandez et al., 2010 J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11:235-244). Here we explore this relation in a side-by-side comparison of the effect of varying noise exposure duration in young (6 week) and older (6 month) CBA/J and CBA/CaJ mice, and in F1 hybrids formed from these. Both the extent of permanent noise-induced threshold shifts (NIPTS) and the probability of a defined NIPTS were determined as exposure to intense broadband noise (4-45 kHz, 110 dB SPL) increased by factors of two from 7 s to 4 h. At 6 months of age the two strains appeared very similar by both measures. At 6 weeks of age, however, both the extent and probability of NIPTS grew much more rapidly with noise duration in CBA/J than in CBA/CaJ. The 'threshold' exposure duration for NIPTS was <1.0 min in CBA/J versus >4.0 min in CBA/CaJ. F1 hybrid mice showed both NIPTS and hair cell loss similar to that in CBA/J. This suggests that dominant-acting alleles at unknown loci distinguish CBA/J from CBA/CaJ. These loci have novel effects on hearing phenotype, as they come into play only during the sensitive period, and may encode factors that demarcate this period. Since the cochlear cells whose fragility defines the early window appear to be hair cells, these loci may principally impact the mechanical or metabolic resiliency of hair cells or the organ of Corti.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21108998      PMCID: PMC3465684          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  56 in total

Review 1.  Genetic studies on noise-induced hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Annelies Konings; Lut Van Laer; Guy Van Camp
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Relation of structural damage to exposure time and intensity in acoustic trauma.

Authors:  H Spoendlin; J P Brun
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1973 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Genetics of age-related hearing loss in mice: I. Inbred and F1 hybrid strains.

Authors:  L C Erway; J F Willott; J R Archer; D E Harrison
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Assessment of hearing in 80 inbred strains of mice by ABR threshold analyses.

Authors:  Q Y Zheng; K R Johnson; L C Erway
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The effects of moderate and low levels of acoustic overstimulation on stereocilia and their tip links in the guinea pig.

Authors:  J A Clark; J O Pickles
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Genetic basis for susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in mice.

Authors:  R R Davis; J K Newlander; X Ling; G A Cortopassi; E F Krieg; L C Erway
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Vulnerability to noise-induced hearing loss in 'middle-aged' and young adult mice: a dose-response approach in CBA, C57BL, and BALB inbred strains.

Authors:  K K Ohlemiller; J S Wright; A F Heidbreder
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Ototoxicity in developing mammals.

Authors:  C M Henley; L P Rybak
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1995-01

9.  Protection against noise-induced hearing loss in young CBA/J mice by low-dose kanamycin.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Fernandez; Kevin K Ohlemiller; Patricia M Gagnon; William W Clark
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-01-22

10.  Noise and the young mouse: genotype modifies the sensitive period for effects on cochlear physiology and audiogenic seizures.

Authors:  K R Henry
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  11 in total

1.  Resistance to noise-induced hearing loss in 129S6 and MOLF mice: identification of independent, overlapping, and interacting chromosomal regions.

Authors:  Valerie A Street; Sharon G Kujawa; Ani Manichaikul; Karl W Broman; Jeremy C Kallman; Dustin J Shilling; Ayaka J Iwata; Linda C Robinson; Carol A Robbins; Jin Li; M Charles Liberman; Bruce L Tempel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-21

2.  Assessing ototoxicity due to chronic lead and cadmium intake with and without noise exposure in the mature mouse.

Authors:  Krystin Carlson; Jochen Schacht; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  The endocochlear potential as an indicator of reticular lamina integrity after noise exposure in mice.

Authors:  Kevin K Ohlemiller; Tejbeer Kaur; Mark E Warchol; Robert H Withnell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Protection by low-dose kanamycin against noise-induced hearing loss in mice: dependence on dosing regimen and genetic background.

Authors:  Kevin K Ohlemiller; Mary E Rybak Rice; Allyson D Rosen; Scott C Montgomery; Patricia M Gagnon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Application of Mouse Models to Research in Hearing and Balance.

Authors:  Kevin K Ohlemiller; Sherri M Jones; Kenneth R Johnson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-17

6.  Large-scale phenotyping of noise-induced hearing loss in 100 strains of mice.

Authors:  Anthony Myint; Cory H White; Jeffrey D Ohmen; Xin Li; Juemei Wang; Joel Lavinsky; Pezhman Salehi; Amanda L Crow; Takahiro Ohyama; Rick A Friedman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Objective Recognition of Tinnitus Location Using Electroencephalography Connectivity Features.

Authors:  Zhaobo Li; Xinzui Wang; Weidong Shen; Shiming Yang; David Y Zhao; Jimin Hu; Dawei Wang; Juan Liu; Haibing Xin; Yalun Zhang; Pengfei Li; Bing Zhang; Houyong Cai; Yueqing Liang; Xihua Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Oncomodulin, an EF-Hand Ca2+ Buffer, Is Critical for Maintaining Cochlear Function in Mice.

Authors:  Benton Tong; Aubrey J Hornak; Stéphane F Maison; Kevin K Ohlemiller; M Charles Liberman; Dwayne D Simmons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Mechanisms of hearing loss after blast injury to the ear.

Authors:  Sung-Il Cho; Simon S Gao; Anping Xia; Rosalie Wang; Felipe T Salles; Patrick D Raphael; Homer Abaya; Jacqueline Wachtel; Jongmin Baek; David Jacobs; Matthew N Rasband; John S Oghalai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Swept-sine noise-induced damage as a hearing loss model for preclinical assays.

Authors:  Lorena Sanz; Silvia Murillo-Cuesta; Pedro Cobo; Rafael Cediel-Algovia; Julio Contreras; Teresa Rivera; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Carlos Avendaño
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.