Literature DB >> 10452235

Functional results of colonic J-pouch anastomosis for rectal cancer.

Y Araki1, H Isomoto, Y Tsuzi, A Matsumoto, M Yasunaga, K Yamauchi, K Hayashi, T Kodama.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to clarify the functional outcomes of colonic J-pouch anastomosis (J-LAR) for lower rectal cancer in comparison with those of traditional straight anastomosis (S-LAR). A questionnaire regarding anorectal function was conducted 1 year after operation on patients who underwent J-LAR (n = 15) and S-LAR (n = 30). The clinical functions were assessed by an incontinence scoring system. The physiologic function was assessed by anorectal manometry and the balloon expulsion test. No patients demonstrated a diverting stoma. The bowel frequency (range) 1 year after operation was 4.8 (3-6) in the S-LAR group and significantly decreased to 1.8 (1-3) in the J-LAR group (P < 0.05). Complete evacuation was 50.2% (40%-60%) in the S-LAR group and significantly increased to 80.6% (60%-90%) in the J-LAR group (P < 0.05). Neorectal compliance was 2.2 (1.4-2.9) ml/mmHg in the S-LAR group and significantly increased to 3.1 (1.3-3.5) ml/mmHg in the J-LAR group (P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the maximum resting or maximum voluntary squeezing pressure. In conclusion, our findings suggested colonic pouch anastomosis performed after a low anterior resection to support the compliance of the (neo)rectum to be an important factor for retaining a satisfactory bowel frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10452235     DOI: 10.1007/BF02482983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  12 in total

1.  Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum.

Authors:  M G O'Riordain; R G Molloy; P Gillen; A Horgan; W O Kirwan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma.

Authors:  N D Karanjia; D J Schache; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer.

Authors:  O Hallböök; P O Nystrom; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome.

Authors:  N J Mortensen; J M Ramirez; N Takeuchi; M M Humphreys
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  F Lazorthes; P Fages; P Chiotasso; J Lemozy; E Bloom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  R Parc; E Tiret; P Frileux; E Moszkowski; J Loygue
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Physiological variation in rectal compliance.

Authors:  M Sørensen; O O Rasmussen; T Tetzschner; J Christiansen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  W G Lewis; P J Holdsworth; B M Stephenson; P J Finan; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch. Prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size.

Authors:  J Hida; M Yasutomi; K Fujimoto; K Okuno; S Ieda; N Machidera; R Kubo; K Shindo; K Koh
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Long-term results at the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics.

Authors:  F Cavaliere; J H Pemberton; M Cosimelli; V W Fazio; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  5 in total

1.  Scintigraphic comparison of neorectal emptying between colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis after stapled low anterior resection.

Authors:  Yoshitake Sugamata; Yasuo Takase; Masatoshi Oya
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Better functional outcome provided by short-armed sigmoid colon-rectal side-to-end anastomosis after laparoscopic low anterior resection: a match-paired retrospective study from China.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Zhang; Xiao-Dong Jin; Yu-Ting Zhang; Zi-Qiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Large contractions in the colonic J-pouch as a possible cause of incomplete evacuation.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Matsuoka; Tadahiko Masaki; Masanori Sugiyama; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Pouch reconstruction in the pelvis.

Authors:  H-P Bruch; O Schwandner; S Farke; J Nolde
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  The effect of neo-rectal wall properties on functional outcome after colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Martijn P Gosselink; David D Zimmerman; Rachel L West; Wim C Hop; Ernst J Kuipers; W Rudolph Schouten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.