Literature DB >> 10450631

Project DARE: no effects at 10-year follow-up.

D R Lynam1, R Milich, R Zimmerman, S P Novak, T K Logan, C Martin, C Leukefeld, R Clayton.   

Abstract

The present study examined the impact of Project DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), a widespread drug-prevention program, 10 years after administration. A total of 1,002 individuals who in 6th grade had either received DARE or a standard drug-education curriculum, were reevaluated at age 20. Few differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of actual drug use, drug attitudes, or self-esteem, and in no case did the DARE group have a more successful outcome than the comparison group. Possible reasons why DARE remains so popular, despite the lack of documented efficacy, are offered.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10450631     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.4.590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  33 in total

Review 1.  Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies.

Authors:  P M Lantz; P D Jacobson; K E Warner; J Wasserman; H A Pollack; J Berson; A Ahlstrom
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Evaluation of community-wide interventions: the ecologic case-referent study design.

Authors:  P A Wiegersma; A Hofman; G A Zielhuis
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Project D.A.R.E. outcome effectiveness revisited.

Authors:  Steven L West; Keri K O'Neal
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Examining the effects of fatal vision goggles on changing attitudes and behaviors related to drinking and driving.

Authors:  Jeremy Jewell; Stephen D A Hupp
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2005-11

5.  Implementing empirically supported treatments in the schools: what are we asking?

Authors:  Steven W Evans; Mark D Weist
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-12

6.  Harm reduction and individually focused alcohol prevention.

Authors:  Clayton Neighbors; Mary E Larimer; Ty W Lostutter; Briana A Woods
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2006-07

Review 7.  Adolescent neurological development and its implications for adolescent substance use prevention.

Authors:  Barbara Lopez; Seth J Schwartz; Guillermo Prado; Ana E Campo; Hilda Pantin
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2008-01-31

Review 8.  Ten good reasons to consider biological processes in prevention and intervention research.

Authors:  Theodore P Beauchaine; Emily Neuhaus; Sharon L Brenner; Lisa Gatzke-Kopp
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2008

9.  Harm reduction: An approach to reducing risky health behaviours in adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  How Initial Prevalence Moderates Network-based Smoking Change: Estimating Contextual Effects with Stochastic Actor-based Models.

Authors:  Jimi Adams; David R Schaefer
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.