Literature DB >> 11949728

Evaluation of community-wide interventions: the ecologic case-referent study design.

P A Wiegersma1, A Hofman, G A Zielhuis.   

Abstract

In a setting of long-standing, community-wide and generally accepted prevention activities like youth health care services in The Netherlands, evaluative research in the form of experimental studies is hardly possible. Furthermore, as most interventions will bear fruit only after several years and the effects are often described in rather vague terms, even non-experimental study designs are fraught with possible difficulties. Although a study design using aggregate data is generally considered inferior or 'incomplete', in many cases, especially in health services research, this approach can be the only one feasible to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive programmes and interventions. In this article we present the ecologic case-referent design as a potentially expedient and valid method for estimating the ecologic effect of a population-wide intervention on the outcome rate in those populations. In this case-referent design, many variables are measured at the individual level, whereas the main exposure variable is measured at an aggregate or ecologic level. Using recently published studies as an example, the advantages and drawbacks of the design are discussed using the randomised controlled trial design as the referent study design.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11949728     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014568930992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  28 in total

1.  Ecological effects in multi-level studies.

Authors:  T A Blakely; A J Woodward
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Prevention of unhealthy behaviour by youth health care in The Netherlands.

Authors:  P A Wiegersma; A Hofman; G A Zielhuis
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-09

3.  Intervention times series analysis of pertussis vaccination in England and Wales.

Authors:  D Z Girard
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  The case against a national screening programme for aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  T R Cheatle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Can we prevent accidental injury to adolescents? A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  J Munro; P Coleman; J Nicholl; R Harper; G Kent; D Wild
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.399

6.  Choosing a future for epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology.

Authors:  M Susser; E Susser
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Re: "When will nondifferential misclassification of an exposure preserve the direction of a trend?".

Authors:  D C Thomas
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  T O Tengs; M E Adams; J S Pliskin; D G Safran; J E Siegel; M C Weinstein; J D Graham
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 9.  Economic evaluation of cholesterol-related interventions in general practice. An appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  T van der Weijden; J A Knottnerus; A J Ament; H E Stoffers; R P Grol
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 10.  "The lower the better" in hypercholesterolemia therapy: a reliable clinical guideline?.

Authors:  T A Jacobson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-03       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hierarchical models to evaluate translational research: Connecticut collaboration for fall prevention.

Authors:  T E Murphy; M E Tinetti; H G Allore
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.