Literature DB >> 10450579

A prospective randomised study (named SVEA) of three methods of delayed breast reconstruction. Study design, patients' preoperative problems and expectations.

Y Brandberg1, M Malm, L E Rutqvist, E Jonsson, L Blomqvist.   

Abstract

A randomised study named SVEA to compare three methods for delayed breast reconstruction was initiated in 1994. The methods were: the lateral thoracodorsal flap, the latissimus dorsi flap, and the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap. In the present paper we describe the study design, primary endpoints, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results from preoperative questionnaires about problems after mastectomy and expectations of the reconstruction are presented. The preoperative questionnaires, completed before randomisation, included a health related quality of life questionnaire, the SF-36, and a questionnaire concerning the impact of breast loss and expectations of the reconstruction. A total of 87 patients have been randomised in SVEA and 30 patients have been followed up outside the randomised study, comprising a reference group. The results from preoperative questionnaires, completed by 106 of the total 117 women, showed that they encountered many problems after mastectomy, primarily about feeling mutilated and being bothered socially. They held high expectations on the breast reconstruction in these areas. The women in the present study did not differ from Swedish women in general regarding health related quality of life, with two exceptions: the study sample scored lower on physical functioning and mental health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10450579     DOI: 10.1080/02844319950159479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg        ISSN: 0284-4311


  7 in total

1.  Polyacrylamide gel injections for breast augmentation: management of complications in 106 patients, a multicenter study.

Authors:  Dmytro Unukovych; Vasyl Khrapach; Marie Wickman; Annelie Liljegren; Volodymyr Mishalov; Gennadiy Patlazhan; Kerstin Sandelin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Body image issues after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Jessica P Gopie; Marc A M Mureau; Caroline Seynaeve; Moniek M Ter Kuile; Marian B E Menke-Pluymers; Reinier Timman; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Laura Snell; Colleen McCarthy; Anne Klassen; Stefan Cano; Lisa Rubin; Karen Hurley; Guy H Montgomery; Peter G Cordeiro; Andrea Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Women's expectations of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kathy Flitcroft; Meagan Brennan; Andrew Spillane
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Awareness and Acceptability of Breast Reconstruction Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Prospective Survey.

Authors:  Nita S Nair; Prasanth Penumadu; Prabha Yadav; Nitin Sethi; Pavneet S Kohli; Vinaykant Shankhdhar; Dushyant Jaiswal; Vani Parmar; Rohini W Hawaldar; Rajendra A Badwe
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-02

6.  Autologous Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ian J Saldanha; Justin M Broyles; Gaelen P Adam; Wangnan Cao; Monika Reddy Bhuma; Shivani Mehta; Andrea L Pusic; Laura S Dominici; Ethan M Balk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 7.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.