Literature DB >> 10449624

Osseointegration of sintered porous-surfaced and plasma spray-coated implants: An animal model study of early postimplantation healing response and mechanical stability.

C A Simmons1, N Valiquette, R M Pilliar.   

Abstract

The osseointegration and long-term success of bone-interfacing implants are dependent on mechanical stability of the implant relative to host bone during the early healing period. The geometric design of an implant surface may play an important role in affecting early implant stabilization, possibly by influencing tissue healing dynamics. In this study, we compared the early tissue healing response and resulting implant stability for two surface designs by characterizing the histological and mechanical properties of the healing tissue around Ti6Al4V sintered porous-surfaced and Ti plasma-sprayed implants. The implants were inserted transversely in rabbit femoral condyles and evaluated at 0, 4, 8, and 16 days postimplantation. At 4 and 8 days after implantation, the early healing tissue (fibrin and collagenous matrix) was more extensively integrated with the three-dimensional interconnected structure of the sintered porous surface than with the irregular geometry of the plasma-sprayed coating. In addition, histological examination indicated that initial matrix mineralization leading to osseointegration occurred more rapidly with the porous-surfaced implants. The more extensive tissue integration and more rapid matrix mineralization with the porous-surfaced implants were reflected in the mechanical test data, which demonstrated greater attachment strength and interfacial stiffness for the porous-surfaced implants 4 and 8 days postimplantation (p <.05). Sixteen days after implantation, both implant designs were osseointegrated and had comparable attachment characteristics. These data demonstrate that appropriate surface design selection can improve early implant stability and induce an accelerated healing response, thereby improving the potential for implant osseointegration. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10449624     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199911)47:2<127::aid-jbm3>3.0.co;2-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  17 in total

1.  Cancellous bone osseointegration is enhanced by in vivo loading.

Authors:  Bettina M Willie; Xu Yang; Natalie H Kelly; Jane Han; Turya Nair; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Fortifying the Bone-Implant Interface Part 2: An In Vivo Evaluation of 3D-Printed and TPS-Coated Triangular Implants.

Authors:  Regina F MacBarb; Derek P Lindsey; Shane A Woods; Peggy A Lalor; Mukund I Gundanna; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 3.  Nanotechnology approaches to improve dental implants.

Authors:  Antoni P Tomisa; Maximilien E Launey; Janice S Lee; Mahesh H Mankani; Ulrike G K Wegst; Eduardo Saiz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Sequential osseointegration from osseohealing to osseoremodeling - Histomorphological comparison of novel 3D porous and solid Ti-6Al-4V titanium implants.

Authors:  Alice Frosch; Sebastian Krohn; Gottfried Buchhorn; Wolfgang Lehmann; Karl-Heinz Frosch; László Füzesi; Stephan Frosch
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Effect of hydrolysis on the phase evolution of water-based sol-gel hydroxyapatite and its application to bioactive coatings.

Authors:  D-M Liu; T Troczynski; D Hakimi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Stem Cells Grown in Osteogenic Medium on PLGA, PLGA/HA, and Titanium Scaffolds for Surgical Applications.

Authors:  Annalia Asti; Giulia Gastaldi; Rossella Dorati; Enrica Saino; Bice Conti; Livia Visai; Francesco Benazzo
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 7.778

8.  Effect of surface roughness on osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite composite.

Authors:  Yi Deng; Xiaochen Liu; Anxiu Xu; Lixin Wang; Zuyuan Luo; Yunfei Zheng; Feng Deng; Jie Wei; Zhihui Tang; Shicheng Wei
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-02-17

9.  Evaluation of osseous integration of PVD-silver-coated hip prostheses in a canine model.

Authors:  Gregor Hauschild; Jendrik Hardes; Georg Gosheger; Sandra Stoeppeler; Helmut Ahrens; Franziska Blaske; Christoph Wehe; Uwe Karst; Steffen Höll
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Rita Depprich; Holger Zipprich; Michelle Ommerborn; Eduardo Mahn; Lydia Lammers; Jörg Handschel; Christian Naujoks; Hans-Peter Wiesmann; Norbert R Kübler; Ulrich Meyer
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.