Literature DB >> 10447535

Proportional assist versus pressure support ventilation: effects on breathing pattern and respiratory work of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

H Wrigge1, W Golisch, J Zinserling, M Sydow, G Almeling, H Burchardi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the breathing pattern and the inspiratory work of breathing (WOB(I)) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assisted with proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and conventional pressure support ventilation (PSV).
DESIGN: Prospective controlled study.
SETTING: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirteen COPD patients being weaned from mechanical ventilation.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients were breathing PSV and two different levels of PAV.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During PAV (EVITA 2 prototype, Dräger, Germany), the resistance of the endotracheal tube (R(et)) was completely compensated while the patients' resistive and elastic loads were compensated for by approximately 80 % and 50 % (PAV(80) and PAV(50)), respectively. PSV was adjusted to match the same mean inspiratory pressure (Pinsp(mean)) as during PAV(80). Airway pressure, esophageal pressure and gas flow were measured over a period of 5 min during each mode. Neuromuscular drive (P(0.1)) was determined by inspiratory occlusions. Mean tidal volume (V(T)) was not significantly different between the modes. However, the coefficient of variation of V(T) was 10 +/- 4.%, 20 +/- 13 % and 15 +/- 8 % during PSV, PAV(80) and PAV(50), respectively. Respiratory rate (RR) and minute ventilation (V(E)) were significantly lower during PAV(80) as compared with both other modes, but the differences did not exceed 10 %. PAV(80) and PSV had comparable effects on WOB(I) and P(0.1), whereas WOB(I) and P(0.1) increased during PAV(50) compared with both other modes.
CONCLUSION: Mean values of breathing pattern did not differ by a large amount between the investigated modes. However, the higher variability of V(T) during PAV indicates an increased ability of the patients to control V(T) in response to alterations in respiratory demand. A reduction in assist during PAV(50) resulted in an increase in WOB and indices of patient effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10447535     DOI: 10.1007/s001340050954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  18 in total

1.  What is the "best PEEP" in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Authors:  H Wrigge; C Putensen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  New things are not always Better: proportional assist ventilation vs. pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  M Vitacca
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Variability analysis of the respiratory volume based on non-linear prediction methods.

Authors:  P Caminal; L Domingo; B F Giraldo; M Vallverdú; S Benito; G Vázquez; D Kaplan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Non-invasive proportional assist and pressure support ventilation in patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic respiratory failure.

Authors:  A Serra; G Polese; C Braggion; A Rossi
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Respiratory muscle workload in intubated, spontaneously breathing patients without COPD: pressure support vs proportional assist ventilation.

Authors:  Stéphanie Delaere; Jean Roeseler; William D'hoore; Pascal Matte; Marc Reynaert; Philippe Jolliet; Thierry Sottiaux; Giuseppe Liistro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Proportional assist ventilation (PAV): a significant advance or a futile struggle between logic and practice?

Authors:  N Ambrosino; A Rossi
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  COPD Patients Have a Restricted Breathing Pattern That Persists with Increased Metabolic Demands.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yentes; Farahnaz Fallahtafti; William Denton; Stephen I Rennard
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.409

8.  Measurement of functional residual capacity by nitrogen washout during partial ventilatory support.

Authors:  Jörg Zinserling; Hermann Wrigge; Dirk Varelmann; Rudolf Hering; Christian Putensen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Physiologic response to varying levels of pressure support and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Davide Colombo; Gianmaria Cammarota; Valentina Bergamaschi; Marta De Lucia; Francesco Della Corte; Paolo Navalesi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  [Ventilation strategies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

Authors:  M Stein; M Joannidis
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 0.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.