Literature DB >> 10444683

Long-term sound conditioning enhances cochlear sensitivity.

S G Kujawa1, M C Liberman.   

Abstract

Sound conditioning, by chronic exposure to moderate-level sound, can protect the inner ear (reduce threshold shifts and hair cell damage) from subsequent high-level sound exposure. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this protective effect, the present study focuses on the physiological changes brought on by the conditioning exposure itself. In our guinea-pig model, 6-h daily conditioning exposure to an octave-band noise at 85 dB SPL reduces the permanent threshold shifts (PTSs) from a subsequent 4-h traumatic exposure to the same noise band at 109 dB SPL, as assessed by both compound action potentials (CAPs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The frequency region of maximum threshold protection is approximately one-half octave above the upper frequency cutoff of the exposure band. Protection is also evident in the magnitude of suprathreshold CAPs and DPOAEs, where effects are more robust and extend to higher frequencies than those evident at or near threshold. The conditioning exposure also enhanced cochlear sensitivity, when evaluated at the same postconditioning time at which the traumatic exposure would be delivered in a protection study. Response enhancements were seen in both threshold and suprathreshold CAPs and DPOAEs. The frequency dependence of the enhancement effects differed, however, by these two metrics. For CAPs, effects were maximum in the same frequency region as those most protected by the conditioning. For DPOAEs, enhancements were shifted to lower frequencies. The conditioning exposure also enhanced both ipsilaterally and contralaterally evoked olivocochlear (OC) reflex strength, as assessed using DPOAEs. The frequency and level dependence of the reflex enhancements were consistent with changes seen in sound-evoked discharge rates in OC fibers after conditioning. However, comparison with the frequency range and magnitude of conditioning-related protection suggests that the protection cannot be completely explained by amplification of the OC reflex and the known protective effects of OC feedback. Rather, the present results suggest that sound conditioning leads to changes in the physiology of the outer hair cells themselves, the peripheral targets of the OC reflex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10444683     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.2.863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  16 in total

1.  Influence of sound-conditioning on noise-induced susceptibility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Barden B Stagner; Glen K Martin; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Prolonged low-level noise-induced plasticity in the peripheral and central auditory system of rats.

Authors:  Adam M Sheppard; Guang-Di Chen; Senthilvelan Manohar; Dalian Ding; Bo-Hua Hu; Wei Sun; Jiwei Zhao; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Regulation of mechanosensation in C. elegans through ubiquitination of the MEC-4 mechanotransduction channel.

Authors:  Xiaoyin Chen; Martin Chalfie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modulation of C. elegans touch sensitivity is integrated at multiple levels.

Authors:  Xiaoyin Chen; Martin Chalfie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Measurement of conductive hearing loss in mice.

Authors:  Zhaobing Qin; Melissa Wood; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: evidence of a misspent youth.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Osteoprotegrin knockout mice demonstrate abnormal remodeling of the otic capsule and progressive hearing loss.

Authors:  Andreas F Zehnder; Arthur G Kristiansen; Joe C Adams; Sharon G Kujawa; Saumil N Merchant; Michael J McKenna
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Synaptic Contributions to Cochlear Outer Hair Cell Ca2+ Dynamics.

Authors:  Marcelo J Moglie; Diego L Wengier; A Belén Elgoyhen; Juan D Goutman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.

Authors:  Gaëlle Naert; Marie-Pierre Pasdelou; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.