Literature DB >> 10444665

Micromechanical responses to tones in the auditory fovea of the greater mustached bat's cochlea.

I J Russell1, M Kössl.   

Abstract

An extended region of the greater mustached bat's cochlea, the sparsely innervated (SI) zone, is located just basally to the frequency place of the dominant 61-kHz component of the echolocation signal (CF2). Anatomic adaptations in the SI zone are thought to provide the basis for cochlear resonance to the CF2 echoes and for the extremely sharp tuning throughout the auditory system that allows these bats to detect Doppler shifts in the echoes caused by insect wing beat. We measured basilar membrane (BM) displacements in the SI zone with a laser interferometer and recorded acoustic distortion products at the ear drum at frequencies represented in the SI zone. The basilar membrane in the SI region was tuned both to its characteristic frequency (62-72 kHz) and to the resonance frequency (61-62 kHz). With increasing stimulus levels, the displacement growth functions are compressive curves with initial slopes close to unity, and their properties are consistent with the mammalian cochlear amplifier working at high sound frequencies. The sharp basilar membrane resonance is associated with a phase lag of 180 degrees and with a shift of the peak resonance to lower frequencies for high stimulus levels. Within the range of the resonance, the distortion product otoacoustic emissions, which have been attributed to the resonance of the tectorial membrane in the SI region, are associated with an abrupt phase change of 360 degrees. It is proposed that a standing wave resonance of the tectorial membrane drives the BM in the SI region and that the outer hair cells enhance, fine tune, and control the resonance. In the SI region, cochlear micromechanics appear to be able to work in two different modes: a conventional traveling wave leads to shear displacement between basilar and tectorial membrane and to neuronal excitation for 62-70 kHz. In addition, the SI region responds to 61-62 kHz with a resonance based on standing waves and thus preprocesses signals which are represented more apically in the CF2 region of the cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10444665     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.2.676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Outer hair cell piezoelectricity: frequency response enhancement and resonance behavior.

Authors:  Erik K Weitzel; Ron Tasker; William E Brownell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Synchronization of a nonlinear oscillator: processing the cf component of the echo-response signal in the cochlea of the mustached bat.

Authors:  Ian J Russell; Markus Drexl; Elisabeth Foeller; Marianne Vater; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Evolutionary aspects of bat echolocation.

Authors:  G Neuweiler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Auditory responses in the cochlear nucleus of awake mustached bats: precursors to spectral integration in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Robert A Marsh; Kiran Nataraj; Donald Gans; Christine V Portfors; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears: evidence of active hearing?

Authors:  Manfred Kössl; Doreen Möckel; Melanie Weber; Ernst-August Seyfarth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Instrumentation for studies of cochlear mechanics: from von Békésy forward.

Authors:  Alfred L Nuttall; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Enhancement of sensitivity gain and frequency tuning by coupling of active hair bundles.

Authors:  Kai Dierkes; Benjamin Lindner; Frank Jülicher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane.

Authors:  Ian J Russell; P Kevin Legan; Victoria A Lukashkina; Andrei N Lukashkin; Richard J Goodyear; Guy P Richardson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-14       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Emilin 2 promotes the mechanical gradient of the cochlear basilar membrane and resolution of frequencies in sound.

Authors:  Ian J Russell; Victoria A Lukashkina; Snezana Levic; Young-Wook Cho; Andrei N Lukashkin; Lily Ng; Douglas Forrest
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Sharp temporal tuning in the bat auditory midbrain overcomes spectral-temporal trade-off imposed by cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Silvio Macías; Julio C Hechavarría; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.