Literature DB >> 10444651

Locomotor strategy for pedaling: muscle groups and biomechanical functions.

C C Raasch1, F E Zajac.   

Abstract

A group of coexcited muscles alternating with another group is a common element of motor control, including locomotor pattern generation. This study used computer simulation to investigate human pedaling with each muscle assigned at times to a group. Simulations were generated by applying patterns of muscle excitations to a musculoskeletal model that includes the dynamic properties of the muscles, the limb segments, and the crank load. Raasch et al. showed that electromyograms, pedal reaction forces, and limb and crank kinematics recorded during maximum-speed start-up pedaling could be replicated with two signals controlling the excitation of four muscle groups (1 group alternating with another to form a pair). Here a four-muscle-group control also is shown to replicate steady pedaling. However, simulations show that three signals controlling six muscle groups (i.e., 3 pairs) is much more biomechanically robust, such that a wide variety of forward and backward pedaling tasks can be executed well. We found the biomechanical functions necessary for pedaling, and how these functions can be executed by the muscle groups. Specifically, the phasing of two pairs with respect to limb extension and flexion and the transitions between extension and flexion do not change with pedaling direction. One pair of groups (uniarticular hip and knee extensors alternating with their anatomic antagonists) generates the energy required for limb and crank propulsion during limb extension and flexion, respectively. In the second pair, the ankle plantarflexors transfer the energy from the limb inertia to the crank during the latter part of limb extension and the subsequent limb extension-to-flexion transition. The dorsiflexors alternate with the plantarflexors. The phasing of the third pair (the biarticular thigh muscles) reverses with pedaling direction. In forward pedaling, the hamstring is excited during the extension-to-flexion transition and in backward pedaling during the opposite transition. In both cases hamstrings propel the crank posteriorly through the transition. Rectus femoris alternates with hamstrings and propels the crank anteriorly through the transitions. With three control signals, one for each pair of groups, different cadences (or power outputs) can be achieved by adjusting the overall excitatory drive to the pattern generating elements, and different pedaling goals (e.g., smooth, or energy-efficient pedaling; 1- or 2-legged pedaling) by adjusting the relative excitation levels among the muscle groups. These six muscle groups are suggested to be elements of a general strategy for pedaling control, which may be generally applicable to other human locomotor tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10444651     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.2.515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  65 in total

1.  Neuromuscular and biomechanical coupling in human cycling: adaptations to changes in crank length.

Authors:  Katya Mileva; Duncan Turner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neuromuscular and biomechanical coupling in human cycling: modulation of cutaneous reflex responses to sural nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Katya Mileva; David A Green; Duncan L Turner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Change of muscle activation patterns in uphill cycling of varying slope.

Authors:  Nejc Sarabon; Borut Fonda; Goran Markovic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of pedaling exercise on the intracortical inhibition of cortical leg area.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Toshiyuki Fujiwara; William Liu; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A method for detecting the temporal sequence of muscle activation during cycling using MRI.

Authors:  Christopher P Elder; Ryan N Cook; Kenneth L Wilkens; Marti A Chance; Otto A Sanchez; Bruce M Damon
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-12-16

6.  Central and sensory contributions to the activation and organization of muscle synergies during natural motor behaviors.

Authors:  Vincent C K Cheung; Andrea d'Avella; Matthew C Tresch; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Biomechanics of submaximal recumbent cycling in adolescents with and without cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Therese E Johnston; Ann E Barr; Samuel Ck Lee
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-04-03

Review 8.  Control of human limb movements: the leading joint hypothesis and its practical applications.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.230

9.  EEG during pedaling: evidence for cortical control of locomotor tasks.

Authors:  Sanket Jain; Krishnaj Gourab; Sheila Schindler-Ivens; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke.

Authors:  David J Clark; Lena H Ting; Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.